reverted because of need to prior align imagery : buidlings have a good precision accuracy when from French Polynesia data (and no other source than worldwide imagery cited)
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/150369906

(because name should be used with real item on site and not oral informations.. : but still i am ok with this approximation)

Hi, thk for the answer. I can tell you Route Ceinture is wrong, it should be Route de Ceinture. then Ouest and Est indicates chich side. Those are not official names but usual names. I am not sure we should have them on the name tag (but I am ok with it). For references with official sources you could check on tefenua.data.gov.pf

Hi thks for the answer. As the original data comes from an official source, I would have suggested to add a fixme or a note, so that we can check on site. I know that the roads can be very tight here. Also when checking with different imageries i am not sure, there is no connexion...

Hi PerpetualHiker. That would be very nice if you could replace piers and buildings where they were at the first place. It comes from quality data (french polynesia government). Thks for you understanding.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/150814189

Hi PerpetualHiker, could you please replace the buildings and piers where they were at the first place? It comes from quality data (French polynesia government). Thks for you understanding.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/150814189

please refer to other comments about aligning imagery first
---
#REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/151033361

please refer to other comments about aligning imagery first
---
#REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/151033279

please refer to other comments about aligning imagery first
---
#REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/151031315

has been reverted (see comments on other changeset)
---
#REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/151069008

reverted
---
#REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/151080167

Hi, Imagery should be moved prior to changing building location. I corrected that.
---
#REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/151115179

Thks! No worries

Okay pas de soucis, du coup je l'ai remis mais en l'identifiant comme récif (natural=reef + reef=coral + name=Oremu). C'était une erreur de tag. Le mieux la prochaine fois c'est de changer les tags plutôt que supprimer l'info (ça fait partie des bonnes pratiques OSM, et comme ça on ne perd pas d'info mais on l'améliore #ameliorationcontinue). Merci pour ton retour rapide, c'est réglé!

Hello, super merci pour les précisions. Et pas besoin de te faire pardonner :D Je te rejoins, on n'est pas sur de l'import massif. La donnée est en licence compatible OSM. Et ton travail est au top, apopo et mauruuru roa! A bientot dans OSM!

Oui escuse moi j'ai été un peu directe, en réalité pour moi l'un n'implique pas l'autre. Et puis le reste de la route restait en secondary donc ça perdait en cohérence. On n'est pas beaucoup en Pf donc des fois ça met du temps. Pour les prochaines fois, si tu veux te faire une idée tu peux aussi jeter un coup d'oeil a www.tefenua.gov.pf (geoportail local) et https://www.tefenua.data.gov.pf/ (pour les données). Merci et bon mapping!

sorry I have to revert your changeset because you displaced good quality located data
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/151384465

Hi birdlawyer, please take care about displacement seriously and tell your #adt friends. You should move imagery prior to move buildings. Buildi gs do have a good precision. Thanks for taking care about it.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/151385148

Hi, I am not sure if I already said it in a different comment to you, so please excuse if you already are aware of that : you should not move buildings prior to move imagery cause they are supposed to be good accuracy. So could you check this changeset and do the adjustment please in regard to taht? (else we lose topo accuracy). Thks in advance
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/151423769

Hi SPaceTracer, thks for your edits. Could you explain why you cut the connexion between the roads (not explained and expressed in the changeset comment), just to make sure it was intentional. Thk in advance
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/151430398