Bienvenu à OSM :)

[leisure=pitch](http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:leisure=pitch) ne devrais être utilisé que pour les terrains de sport eux-mêmes. Pour l'ensemble du lieu cela dépend des cas, mais en l'occurence il me semble que [landuse=recreation_ground](http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:landuse=recreation_ground) serais approprié ?

Essai supprimé.

La carte que vous éditez ici est commune à tou les utilisateurs. Si vous voulez expérimenter, utilisez le mode "bac à sable" de l'éditeur "iD" (cliquez sur la fleche à coté de "éditer" pour utiliser un autre éditeur que celui par défaut).

Si vous avez des questions, n'hésitez pas à cliquer sur "aide" en haut à droite.

Checked the Kilkenny fix, which is fine :)

Please split that kind of changeset into smaller areas : it makes reviewing easyer.

Is the construction of the parking finished ?

Shouldn't node/3268911819 be natural=hill ?

Is the place=region node (node/3264138716) supposed to be a locality, or is it just a mishap that should be deleted ?

Reverted. Please grow up, and contribute something usefull.

OSM is a collaborative project. We all work on the same data. Changes you make here are presented to the community, so you should only contribute information that exists in real life. If you want to experiement in a sandbox, use the iD editor's tutorial mode.

Hi, welcome to OSM :)

You need to tag the nodes in order for them to be usefull. Looking for osm.wiki/Cave I suppose ?

Also, I expect the node off the irish coast is an editing misshap, no cave there ?

Collecting many points during your initial survey is great, no need to change that. But (IMHO) apply some restraint when uploading to osm.

Josm's simplify way tool *can* be used, but you really need to lower its threshold otherwise (as Rovastar pointed out) it'll remove too much detail. edit -> preferences -> advanced ->search for "simplify" and lower it to 0.3 or less (experiment to find a value you're comfortable with).

Nice surveying job, but there are a few issues :

* The golf tags are duplicated on all the nodes, when they should only be on the ways. Search (ctrl+f) for "type:node golf=*" in josm to select and cleanup the nodes.
* A few fairways are mapped in duplicates. Choose one.
* There are pointlessly too many nodes. Surveying with high accuracy is great, but adding intermediate nodes on a straight section is just a waste of ressources. Use "tools -> simplify way" in josm (tweak its threshold in the preferences).

Cool, I was recently wondering about the status this planned bridge, and now OSM brings me the good news :) Cheers.

Fair enough. Maybe add a note tag to the object to ward off future interrogations.

Does the current usage also warrant the highway=track tagging (in addition to railway=abandoned) ?

Are you sure about changing the barrier=ditch to railway=abandoned ? See note/305694

See node/267762522 for the consented-upong naming and proper tagging. It'd be nice to have map the boundary, but that one was really off the mark as well.

Ok :) And it looks like the original mapper too agrees with the changes (changeset/25319910). Thanks for contributing.

Mostly deleted by changeset/28109717

Please discuss and keep the tags as factual as possible.

Hi, welcome to OSM :)

Please add a comment on why you deleted this. What is your source of information ? Was the feature badly tagged ? If so, you should change its name rather than deleting it.

Hi, congrats on your first changeset :)

You might wonder why nothing appears on the rendered map. This is because you need to add tags to your way to describe what it is. See osm.wiki/Highway

It looks like this way should be "highway=unclassified" at the start of it, and then become a "highway=track" (the osm way needs to be split). Fancy finishing the job ?

Thanks, and welcome.

How was the train platform "problematic" ? Current status looks even more problematic, I'd be surprised if it refected reality. Did you survey, or just look at the osm data ?