I picked up a few cities that aren't county seats during this changeset but forgot to mention that in the changeset comment. Eventually I think all incorporated places in WA should get this treatment.

I'm not sure if the name suggestion index needs to be updated, but iD was trying to prompt me to tag Link stations as either "not the same Sounder" or change the "network" and "wikidata:network" tags to Sounder (both options seemed incorrect, so I ignored the warnings).

Made a mistake that I corrected in changeset/147105488.

I still believe "living street" should apply to the stretch of N 100th St between Stone Ave N and College Way N but consensus has not been reached. I will revisit once the planned upgrades to this stretch are constructed (expected this year).

I went ahead and restored the deleted path since I didn't hear back, if this was in error please do let me know.
Change made in changeset/145342071

Hello, welcome to OpenStreetMap! I see this is your first edit, thanks for your contribution! I was looking at Cowen Park Bridge and noticed there may be a duplicate road now, as well as a pedestrian bridge over Ravenna Creek that was deleted by this changeset. I believe these were both in error, but if that bridge no longer exists please let me know here. I've just fixed the duplicated road issue, but please let me know here if that pedestrian bridge should be restored. Thanks!

I also moved University Place node to actually be within the borders of University Place. And (mostly as a note to self) there are some CDPs that are not on the map in Pierce County that may be worth adding as simple place nodes since they have significant populations.

Hi there, looks like the western sidewalk on the Montlake Blvd overpass is open as of early yesterday. However, I see you surveyed it yesterday so just wanted to confirm with you whether this was the case or not?

This changeset also removed a bicycle=yes tag between Denny and Howell, it was not necessary, bicycles are legal on most streets and there is no special signage on this one.

Great, I've gone ahead and done so in this changeset, thanks!
changeset/142487279

Hi there, it is my understanding that bicycles are no longer restricted from the Green Lake Park Inner Loop since 2022:
https://www.seattle.gov/parks/about-us/projects/green-lake-inner-loop

I can revert the bicycle access tag if you like unless there's some reason you believe bicycles are not allowed?

Thank you, I appreciate the quick update!

Hi there, it seems you've added some bicycle restrictions on ways that also have cycleway tags. These seem to contradict each other, would you be able to clarify one way or the other?

Congrats on your first changeset! Since you requested a review I have taken a look and the content looks accurate, nice job. The only thing I'll mention is that it is useful to include the "source" field on changesets so others can know how you determined the edit was warranted.

Forgot to add source before submitting changeset: local knowledge

I had read that previously and just re-read it, I don't think the blurb on the Wiki is very definitive one way or the other. I agree the speed limits aren't as low as they could be, but seeing as these streets allow pedestrians to walk throughout the right of way and motor vehicles must yield to them, this is effectively achieving the same goal. My experience living a block from a Healthy Street is that there is much less traffic on them and more pedestrians and cyclists.

Hello, I think many of the streets you've reclassified from living_street to residential are in fact "living streets," as they are closed to through motor vehicle traffic and motor vehicles must yield to pedestrians and bicycles.

https://www.seattle.gov/transportation/projects-and-programs/programs/stay-healthy-streets

May want to reroute the Interurban Trail relation to use this ramp rather than the crosswalks, not sure what the more accepted route is.

Hi there, when the features I'm mapping appear in both Bing and King County imagery I tend to swap between them while I'm aligning things. Typically whichever one the existing objects in an area better align with I'll use for reference. As for a particular offset value, rather than use a set value I find that I have to shift the imagery bit by bit to match existing object alignments as I move further in one direction. Hope that helps, happy to discuss further if you like!

Hi, "lut" is the ISO 639-3 code for Lushootseed.