In any case. I will remove all my tracks that I have made over the last 8 months above 450 meters above sea level in the Carpathians. As I was advised by tourists (which I have already started to do before). The problem is that in other parts of the Carpathians MapWithAI also occurs (48.8454 / 22.5802). And for some reason you are fighting only with me.

Please take a look here:
https://map.land.gov.ua/?cc=2657643.816380124,6197966.900528279&z=16&l=kadastr&bl=ortho10k_all
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/114418394

Дякую. Випередив мене!

...although in my opinion there are is allotments (relation/6093419).

1. Do you need me to delete them?
2. The author of relation/6093419 was not me!
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/114413141

Do you need me to delete them?
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/114416464

Ukraine. Івано-Франківська область. Додавання кладовищ, відсутніх в ОСМ
https://maproulette.org/browse/challenges/19281, забрав неправильны теги "tracktype=grade3"
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/114376000

Дякую за корегування

Дякую за корекцію.

Вдячний за корекцію.

"GH_1" означає, що автор додав два дерева. Ну хіба незрозуміло комусь? :-)

Tracktype=grade5 I tagged conditionally, because the JOSM editor issued an error without tag “tracktype”. Thank You for comment, Andy. In the future I will try not to make such mistakes

Tracktype=grade3 I tagged conditionally, because the JOSM editor issued an error without tag “tracktype”.

- Regarding highway=track + tracktype=grade3. Tracktype=grade3 I tagged conditionally, because the JOSM editor issued an error without tag “tracktype”. (In order to reduce validator errors).
- Regarding road connectivity. As you can see from my sets of changes in the road graph, which I import from MapWithAI, there are mostly no road dangles, and in places where it is impossible to do without them, I try to leave the tag "noexit = yes", according to the Rules.
- I also try not to have any routing errors in the data I import/create in OSM (thanks to OSM-data validators). Such changes are marked by me as “routing fixes”. And created after the final verification of the graph by validators (OSMOSE and OSM Inspector).

Ця помилка вже скоригована автором повідомлення.

оf course. After talking to local tourists, I learned that the road does not exist there, instead noted the stream that passes nearby (to avoid removing the paths from the database OSM).

Ternopil region (oblast) of Ukraine wikipedia:
https://uk.wikipedia.org/wiki/%D0%A2%D0%B5%D1%80%D0%BD%D0%BE%D0%BF%D1%96%D0%BB%D1%8C%D1%81%D1%8C%D0%BA%D0%B0_%D0%BE%D0%B1%D0%BB%D0%B0%D1%81%D1%82%D1%8C

Hi, Andy. Yes, I really made a mistake in the title to the set of changes. This should be: "#Kaart OSMOSE (item # 1190) fixes [te.ua]"
This is just a rounding of roads / streams / railways
[te.ua] is a domain name of the Ternopil region of Ukraine (see https://uk.wikipedia.org/wiki/%D0%A2%D0%B5%D1%80%D0%BD%D0%BE% D0% BF% D1% 96% D0% BB% D1% 8C% D1% 81% D1% 8C% D0% BA% D0% B0_% D0% BE% D0% B1% D0% BB% D0% B0% D1% 81% D1% 82% D1% 8C)
I was wrong with the name because I work in parallel with two OSM data validators.
In the future, I will notice my sets of changes in a different way to make it clearer.

https://osmose.openstreetmap.fr/en/issues/open?item=1190

Hello. Andy
Yes, indeed, this path was added based on MapWithAI. I admit that on this line (way/960173443) the road tag was mistakenly added. As you can see from my previous sets, I later revise the lines I have implemented and, if necessary, correct them. Thanks for the comments.

Thanks. This was my purely mechanical error (copy/pastіng numbers).