Unarmored5156's Comments
| Changeset | When | Comment |
|---|---|---|
| 161918646 | Ladybug already exists as node/9581502446. Reverting for this reason. |
|
| 161918532 | Reverting for similar reasons as to changeset/161918270 (duplicated residential road) |
|
| 161918500 | Reverting for similar reasons as to changeset/161918270 (duplicated residential road) |
|
| 161918462 | Reverting for similar reasons as to changeset/161918270 (duplicated residential road) |
|
| 161918348 | Reverting for similar reasons as to changeset/161918270 (highway=motorway is invalid here) |
|
| 161918241 | Reverting for similar reasons as to changeset/161918270 (highway=pedestrian is inappropriate in this context, and duplicates existing crossings) |
|
| 161918203 | Reverting for similar reasons as to changeset/161918270 (highway=pedestrian is inappropriate in this context, and duplicates existing crossings) |
|
| 161918192 | Reverting for similar reasons as to changeset/161918270 (highway=pedestrian is inappropriate in this context, and duplicates existing crossings) |
|
| 161918139 | I remember this being under construction several years ago when I visited this area... but I'm not sure about now and given the construction area is just added with this changeset I doubt it. Requires survey to verify. Not reverting. |
|
| 161918035 | Reverting for similar reasons as to changeset/161918270 (the new foot path duplicates an existing highway=cycleway that permits foot traffic) |
|
| 161917817 | Reverting as the new sidewalk duplicates an existing one for most of its path. It could be fixed up by splitting the way in the middle but at this point I'm kinda tired of manually doing some of these. Extend the existing sidewalk if you'd like to. |
|
| 161917039 | Partly reverting (deleting ContaineR Park addition for reasons prior stated) |
|
| 161917260 | Fully reverting as there's no need for three ContaineR parks. |
|
| 161917584 | Partly reverting this one (ContaineR Park already existed, adding two new parks is redundant, as well you dragged a intersection node onto part of the "new" park outline), but the house addition seems valid and should be kept. |
|
| 161917785 | See 161918011 for an explanation on why I'm reverting this one changeset/161918011 (sidewalks already existed here, edits to them were just adding redundant nodes) |
|
| 161917855 | See 161918011 for an explanation on why I'm reverting this one changeset/161918011 (sidewalks already existed here, edits to them were just adding redundant nodes) |
|
| 161917980 | See 161918011 for an explanation on why I'm reverting this one changeset/161918011 |
|
| 161918011 | Reverting for similar reasons to 161918045 changeset/161918045, however fully reverting this one as it already had the alley here. |
|
| 161918045 | I'm partly reverting this changeset as the path only partly duplicates the alley added here. The path has been deleted while the alley has been kept. |
|
| 161918135 | Reverting for similar reasons to 161918151 changeset/161918151 |