next time when you add footpaths inside of a park please connect them to the wider network so that you are not forming a pedestrian navigation island.

after bringing this up on the open street map us slack I agree that it may be useful to add these in multiple changesets and without all of the tags, I just hope that you continue to add the rest of the trees in Fairchild to OSM and please ensure that what you are adding is actually there in the latest imagery

https://osmus.slack.com/archives/C2VJAJCS0/p1755002235030229

happy mapping,
Udar

there are trees added in this changeset that are in the middle of water and some that are not there on the latest imagery (bing aerial). There is also the fact that, from what I can tell you have in meany parts of the gardens added only a subsection of the trees in the area so it might be better to do some of these as areas. I would not be against utra micro mapping out every individual tree in the main part of Fairchild but if that is to be done, it should be aligned correctly to the bing or "Esri World Imagery" and every tree should be added, along with adding `leaf_type`, `species`, `species:wikidata`, `leaf_cycle` and `denotation` tags to each.
This comment also applies to changeset/170331276.

Happy mapping,
Udar.

looking further into the business shop=sunglasses seems to be correct, the only website I could find for this business was on the mall website https://shopdolphinmall.com/stores/just-one-look-fashion-eyewear

next time can you please add a changeset comment describing what you have done. the comment for this changeset need only be something like "added gate". for more info see osm.wiki/Good_changeset_comments

I tagged this one as glasses because they didn't seem to do eye exams, they seemed to only sell designer sunglasses. This can sort of be seen in the panoramax image linked.

I created a geojson with the area that I still need to realign roads in currently https://github.com/Udarthegreat/public-sources/blob/5824ca8437aebaa5f0ab31fad5e3f0de3e0489b8/other/area%20road%20todo.geojson

the project I would like created on the OSMUS tasking manager would be within the following geojson file https://github.com/Udarthegreat/public-sources/blob/b5bc9dc02fed82c7da24ebf8f17648053da34635/tasking%20manager/pedestrian%20feature%20addition%201/area%20for%20sidewalks.geojson
I am still working on road alingnments, and will needed around a week or two to finish, alignments below US 1v South Dixie Highway, I have been actively working on that over the last few weeks.

based on the website provided I would say that the bridges of Okeechobee shouldn't be connected directly to Hialeah Gardens Boulevard as you currently have it, that intersection is on a bridge. I did a preliminary ix but I would like y'all to look over and that ensure it is correct.

I am pretty sure that the Domino park has not closed https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/M%C3%A1ximo_G%C3%B3mez_Park

I do not see the ALPR on the streetside imagery so I was wondering what your source is for this. Also generally I don't think that these should be placed as a vertex in the middle of a road.

how do you add so meany translations in one go; do you really know over 50 languages from very different parts of the world.

please respond

short_name is supposed to be used for acronyms and other less obvious shortening, essentially is should a name that couldn't just be converted from a list of known shortcodes; so the use of short_name in this commit is incorrect. for more info see short_name=*#When_to_use .
I have fixed the error.

happy mapping,
Udar.

please respond

a few issues here, first of all as it is right now this is just a point with out an amenity of other identifying tag, this is an issue as those are required to make an item in OSM useful. The closest I can think of is a non profit office but that is iffy.
Second, I doubt that such a feature would be located in the middle of a school.
Third, you certainly should not have attached it to the vertex of the running track area.
You also have several dragged nodes in this commit.

The question becomes what is this feature supposed to be, because I have a feeling OSM doesn't currently have a tag for this, but we may be able to come up with something if you provide more info as a response.

Happy mapping,
Udar.

can you please give the geometry of way/39348297 another look as I doubt the angle at the end there is correct.

Happy mapping,
Udar.

please stop with these as previously requested changeset/169617044

please stop with these as previously requested changeset/169617044

Thank you, it does seem like a large parking lot, to be completely honest I expected this to become a residential area but I guess not.