please stop splitting the crossings as separate geometry here as it is not, if you look at the bing streetside in the area you will clearly see that the sidewalk continues through the crossing and thus is not separate geometry. Its not even like the sidewalk lowers to the road level, the sidewalk level on either side is the exact same, this is very clearly a single continuous sidewalk, so please stop splitting this way.

please stop splitting the crossings as separate geometry here as it is not, if you look at the bing streetside in the area you will clearly see that the sidewalk continues through the crossing and thus is not separate geometry. Its not even like the sidewalk lowers to the road level, the sidewalk level on either side is the exact same, this is very clearly a single continuous sidewalk, so please stop splitting this way.

forgot to put in the changeset comment that this was only for the ground floor.

I undid this in changeset/165738146 as I could not tell if this is even under construction yet and thus it shouldn't be in OSM yet.

from what I can tell this, if it has even started construction wont open until 2028 so it should be tagged as construction.

question, does your business take up the whole building the point you added is in or are there other businesses in there with you, aka is your business the only one inside of q=way way/435519095 .

whats your source for removing the address from way way/435238907 .

why did you add turn:lanes tagging to vertex node/7085335815 as it is a crossing vertex and I don't think turn:lanes is supposed to be on crossing vertexes, if I'm missing something here feel free to correct me.

Happy mapping,
Udar.

forgot to add to the source tag on the changeset that I went to the Patricia and Phillip Frost Museum of Science last June so in the source tag there should also have survey.

why did you move the address node/6057551973 to the middle of the road, and the name you added to the building, what type of business is it.
Further reviewing the streetside imagery around the building there seems to be multiple businesses in that building so are you sure that that is the name of the building as it may just be one business within it, aka what is your source for this commit.

the name tag on SR 19 was removed from way/17448431 way back in 2011 with commit changeset/8132573 , why did you add it back as the ref=SR 19 is seemingly enough.

whats the source for this as you have been adding allot across the country

what no longer exists from this commit, this touched several businesses which one are you talking about.

whats the source for this commit as the website of the car dealership has keywords in it added by google maps and we are not allowed to use them as a source for commits due to license issues.

this is incorrect as the arrivals service road is clearly tagged as being on level=0 and the footway on level=0. The values of the levels in this case are correct so they should not share a vertex as they are on different levels and thus cannot be navigated from one to the other directly.

whats the source for this commit?

whats the source for this as from the aerial imagery available in the area it does not seem as if planes can enter these, these seem more like warehouses were cargo/mail is taken of of planes and put in trucks, so I don't think the "aeroway=hangar" tag is correct here.

at Leonard Usina Hall of Science at MDC Kendall

whats the source for this commit.

why did you add the "aeroway=bldg" as this does not seem to be an existing tag according to taginfo https://taginfo.openstreetmap.org/keys/aeroway#values , what is this tag
supposed to mean? also, what is you source for this commit?