this is just wrong, there is, to my knowledge no "Orlando" here.

please respond

a few issues here,
first of all why did you delete that one random tree, it still seems to be there on the imagery.
second, it seems like "Legal Edge Services" still exists according to the website provided for that business before you replaced with your business.
third of all, why did you make your business a tree, this is because according to your website it seems like "office=lawyer" is likely correct for your business.

whats the source for this commit?

whats the source for this commit?

can someone who knows the admin_level=* tag check if this is correct since I have a feeling that this commit is incorrect due to how suspicious allot of this contributors commits are. They have a really a high percentage of completely empty commits and for the the ones that aren't empty the change set comments are seemingly random places and usually no were near the actual geographic area the commit takes up.

also a note based on some of your previous commits, we cannot use google as a source for OSM commits and you have placed "#Google" in the hashtags of previous commits so I feel its warranted to point this out.

This park is already mapped so this seems to be a duplicate.
Next time please provide a better change set comment, for more info see osm.wiki/Good_changeset_comments

at TPA

If you know their wrong then you should be able to determine the correct values so please add the correct ones. It is really unfortunate to have taxiways that don't have a ref in OSM since that is basically required information for any potential data consumers.

please respond to the questions about the additions in Miami Dade County, I would really like to know what the source for those is and in general an answer to my other questions about this commit posted above.

a few notes here, first of all next time please try to keep the geographic size of your commits down.
second I doubt that there is a community center in the middle of the FIU parking lots. third, the guest houses you added in Doral are definitely positioned incorrectly as they are bunched together way to much and some of their names sound somewhat suspicious since a name like "home" or "home sleep" sound incorrect. so I would like to kn ow what the sources for this commit are.

whats the source for this?

did you add this purely based on the aerial imagery (armchair mapping) or have you recently been through here (since late July of this year which is when I last was at MIA) recently because otherwise this parking lot no longer exists. the construction isn't on any of the latest imagery but it was clear that they were building a multistory parking garage (it was labeled as such) and that isn't what you mapped. so either this needs tagging and geometry fixes or no longer exists.

first of all I doubt that Expedia and booking.com are license compliant with OSM so I doubt that they can be used as sources for OSM commits. second non of those sources mention who gave the hotel 4 stars they just call it 4 star, the whole point is that the star rating is supposed to come from a verifiable source, something official. quoting the wiki:
"To comply with the verifiability requirement, only stars that are awarded by recognised tourism boards, based on objective criteria, or based on association memberships, should be mapped. That excludes values from rating platforms that collect subjective opinions. "
and:
"The US has no standard hotel/restaurant rating system, as such, all star ratings in the US are a form of advertising. So the use of the stars tag in the US is discouraged. "

next time please split your commit into multiple geographically smaller changes instead of on that is this large. in the case of this commit, based on what I could see in OSMCha this should have been two, one in Puerto Rico and another in Indiantown.

way/786346226

Before you add something please check that someone hasn’t already mapped the building, you may need to change a few tags but adding a new building one top of the existing building is incorrect unless your using building:part=* , this is the kind you of thing we (the OSM community) have tools like osmose and osmi to find along with many others since we don’t want overlapping buildings.

If it is done then it is a parking garage (the imagery isn’t up to date) and it is likely called Parking Garage 6 because that is what the signs on the fences surrounding the construction said when it was under construction. I can attest to it being a parking garage as I flew out and into MIA in July and saw them building it from the other parking garages and the departures road at that point.

this seems to have added a duplicate object

does this mean that the construction there is complete in that area.