Why remove the roads under construction

whats the source for this?

Several nodes like 10770256469 were converted from uncontrolled to marked. As to why uncontrolled is preferable to marked it is simple, it seems to be the community consensus, I say this because the Id tagging schema has “marked crossing” tagged with crossing=uncontrolled.

I also personally prefer if it because wether or not a crossing is marked or unmarked is denoted by crossing:markings so uncontrolled is preferable because it lowers duplication in tagging meaning and keeps wether or not a crossing is signalized to uncontrolled vs traffic_signals since that is the difference between the two.

Happy mapping,
Udar

The tiger road names are the same (or at least when they were imported) and had to be expanded afterwards. That’s why I say it’s convention to have to full name (street instead of st for example). I understand what happened I just left the comment as a note for future reference.

Happy mapping,
Udar

Please stop converting crossing=uncontrolled to crossing=marked.

crossing:signals=no is implied on crossing=uncontrolled and thus shouldn’t be added, please stop adding these. The fact that it is uncontrolled means that it doesn’t have crossing signals.

The names of the stations shouldn’t use the shortenings, aka sw for southwest and st for street they should be using the longer names, that just convention in the community.

Somehow this makes the mulipolygon area the Miami river stop rendering, no idea why.

Then don’t “fix” those errors since they are incorrect.

crossing:signals=no is implied on crossing=uncontrolled, please stop adding these tags.

Happy mapping
Udar

Next time please don’t convert crossing=uncontrolled to crossing=marked since uncontrolled is the default for marked crossings.

Happy mapping
Udar

Next time please don’t convert crossing=uncontrolled to crossing=marked since uncontrolled is the default for marked crossings.

Happy mapping
Udar

crossing:signals=no is implied on crossing=uncontrolled and crossing=unmarked so please stop adding them.

Happy mapping
Udar

My main issue is that when land use is attached to roads if those roads are edited in such a way that vertexes are added or removed the size of the change set becomes unnecessarily large because the land use also gets edited. Also if a road becomes dual carriageway it will have to be split from road anyways.

crossing:signals=no on crossing=uncontrolled is implied so please stop adding it.

crossing:signals=no on crossing=uncontrolled is implied and thus shouldn’t be added, please stop doing this, this also applies to crossing:signals=yes on crossing=traffic_signals since that to is implied.

Please stop connecting landuse to roads.

Please stop adding crossing:signals=no on crossing=uncontrolled since that is implied on ways with crossing=uncontrolled. Also on crossing=traffic_signals crossing:signals=yes is implied so please stop adding these.

Please stop adding crossing:signals=no on crossing=uncontrolled since that is implied on ways with crossing=uncontrolled.

Please stop adding crossing:signals=no on crossing=uncontrolled since that is implied on ways with crossing=uncontrolled.