Udarian's Comments
| Changeset | When | Comment |
|---|---|---|
| 147164487 | Quick question,
|
|
| 147083599 | Please revert, see previous commit by your team with the exact same changes changeset/142847824
|
|
| 147082041 | Please revert, see previous commit by your team with the exact same changes changeset/142847824
|
|
| 147081412 | Please revert, see previous commit by your team with the exact same changes changeset/142847824
|
|
| 147081085 | Please revert, see previous commit by your team with the exact same changes changeset/142847824
|
|
| 147082164 | Please revert, see previous commit by your team with the exact same changes changeset/142847824
|
|
| 147081578 | Please revert, see previous commit by your team with the exact same changes changeset/142847824
|
|
| 147085907 | Please revert, see previous commit by your team with the exact same changes changeset/142847824
|
|
| 147082435 | Please revert, see previous commit by your team with the exact same changes changeset/142847824
|
|
| 146783846 | please respond |
|
| 146783763 | please respond |
|
| 146904048 | can you check if way way/1187974460 is multiple ways (each oneway=yes), since when I last passed by the site there seemed to be physically separated ways (separated by kerbs) for entrance and exit (though it was still under construction), it seems that this is were the entrance/exit gates for the apartment complex is.
|
|
| 146628670 | Yes, please check next week, thank you so much for double checking for me.
|
|
| 146783846 | Did you drive on the actual of road tracks or even go inside the area because I it think driving by on Krome Avenue or Southwest 167th Avenue would slow you to see the inner ones? I ask because they are there on the latest imagery.again based on the latest imagery these ways still exist, unless you went inside the farmland I doubt you could tell wether or not some of these ways were there or no since they are not visible from the paved roads on the sides if the farm land.
|
|
| 146783763 | Did you drive on the actual of road tracks or even go inside the area because I it think driving by on Krome Avenue or Southwest 167th Avenue would slow you to see the inner ones? I ask because they are there on the latest imagery.again based on the latest imagery these ways still exist, unless you went inside the farmland I doubt you could tell wether or not some of these ways were there or no since they are not visible from the paved roads on the sides if the farm land.
|
|
| 145208698 | Then there is not use for highway=busway, because highway=busway and highway=service + access=no + bus=designated mean the exact same thing. Since it seams to be down to preference (since they mean the exact same thing with not distinction between the two) it is preferable that highway=busway be used in Miami. it makes no sense to use both tagging's in a since town/city, use either all busways use highway=busway or all of them use highway=service + access=no + bus=designated . if you want to use highway=service + access=no + bus=designated then you should update ways such as way/42507785 to use that tagging . consistency in tagging within a region matters allot. when tagging is consistent, new contributors can figure out what the best ways to map features by just looking at what has already been fully mapped. it also helps ensure that different areas with different customs and preferences remain consistently well mapped (both tagging and geometry) by following standards set by the local community. so again please remove the highway=service + access=no + bus=designated on this and other way or remove the highway=busway on other ways in Miami Dade county and replace it with your preferred tagging. there is also the fact that highway=busway is the what the community uses since the iD tagging schema has that as the tagging added to a way if added as a "busway" and the ways modified in this commit are busways without a shadow of a doubt. |
|
| 145539922 | Again I would really like to know when you made those tagging changes as per the above comment I left. |
|
| 146342722 | what is the source for this edit,, I see nothing that would imply that bikes aren't allowed on these ways. |
|
| 146342554 | as mentioned above there doesn't seem to be any signage prohibiting bikes from using these ways so what is the source for these edits. also this uses a non standard tag that implies yes, if it isnt specified whether or not a certain for of transportation has access to a footpath it is assumed to be the default for the way, which in the case of sidewalks is yes. so please stop using this non standard tagging, the OSM community has agreed upon and uses certain tags for certain purposes for a reason, please stop using this non standard tag and respond as to what the source for this is. |
|
| 146342722 | please respond |