Shouldn't the section of I95 that US 1 uses that SR 5 thus follows be tagged with the unsigned_ref of 5, so unsigned_ref=SR 9A;SR 5 . I ask as since the relation uses those ways, shouldn't they also be tagged as such.

Happy mapping,
Udar.

This changeset adds a duplicate business, next time edit existing features instead of adding a completely new business when one is already mapped. for more info see osm.wiki/One_feature,_one_OSM_element .

Happy mapping,
Udar.

Please updated the position of the ALPR edited in this changeset as it is in the middle of the road area in such a way that it is highly unlikely that it is correct. This applies under multiple aerial imagery sources.

Happy mapping,
Udar

There are a few issues with this changeset outside of the SEO description, The first and largest is that this removed the building=* tag from an area that very clearly represents a building. While this does have landuse=* on the tag now I don't think that the landuse=* tag is the correct to tag this type of feature. Also this building seems to be a townhouse, or something similar so there are likely to be multiple units per building, as such the business should probably not be tagged on the area its self but instead as a point. Lastly, the image=* tag should point to an image of the business its self (the building it is located in, the store front, the area its within) and not the logo of the business.

Happy Mapping,
Udar

From what I can tell peakbagger.com is a proprietary source that does specifically allow usage as a source for OSM contributions and thus cannot be used as a source for OSM contributions.

Happy mapping,
Udar.

Also, just to make sure I correctly understand what this changeset is trying to do, these are supposed to be the points of highest elevation in each county?

what is your source for these points?

Happy mapping,
Udar

Next time please be more careful with alignment changes as this changeset ended up overlapping pedestrian features causing data issues. Plus usually buildings do not cover part of the road area like that. The building has not been built yet in the imagery either.

Happy mapping,
Udar.

Thanks for this

Question, what is your source for this changeset, I ask because I spent several hours yesterday trying to check this, I didn't find anything that showed that FDOT had stopped designating this as SR 847, I dd se some things that show the Miami Dade county is not in charge of construction and maintanace on this segment of road, but it seems it is still designated as SR 847 by FDOT.

Happy mapping,
Udar.

the feature added in this changeset is on land on the latest imagery (Esri World Imagery) even though it is tagged as man_made=pier so logically it should be at least partially over water. Thus it would be wonderful if you would double check the position of the pier added in this changeset.

Happy mapping,
Udar.

Generally names are not supposed to be used for descriptions and this changeset seems to do so. Also I was wondering what your source for this changeset is as I do not see evidence of any of these features on the latest imagery in this area(Esri World Imagery).

Happy mapping,
Udar

can you please take another look at where ways way/39349857 and way/11113189 meet as the angle they come together at seems rather sharp and thus unlikely, If you send me a screen shot of the area with the imagery you did this on I would be glad to make any necessary changes my self. As a note the latest imagery available in iD is "Esri World Imagery", though it is somewhat out of date at this point, it has some of these details in it to some degree though.

Happy Mapping,
Udar.

I asked because your changeset comment didn't indicate how you figured out the Wendy's had closed and as you contribute business changes throughout the US somewhat randomly I didn't feel it was a safe assumption to make that you are familiar with the area and thus would know about this from local knowledge or survey. So I felt it was important to ensure the sources used where OSM license compliant. Based on your response it seems like everything is ok, I was jut being vigilant, trying to make sure the data quality in Miami Dade County remains as high as possible. As a note if you had added to your comment something like "based on OSM notes and companies website" I probably wouldn't have left the initial comment as I could have inferred the source from that.
As for the addresses, they were imported around 2017-2018 from an official county source, they tend to be relatively good but can be stale or missing in some areas where there have been changes since then, especially around construction that has happened since then.

Happy Mapping,
Udar.

what is your source for the Wendy's being closed?

Happy mapping,
Udar.

forgot to add road name at the end there, the end of the changeset comment was intended to be "at i95 and SR 860 Miami Gardens Drive."

does this mean that the Ross is no longer there?

Happy Mapping,
Udar.

After looking through some of these it seems like a decent amount of these are duplicates of some form of already mapped features. Can you please look back through this changeset and fix the duplicates.

Happy Mapping,
Udar.

wrong changeset comment, the correct on would have been:
"minor road alignment fixes and added previously unmapped pedestrian features".