please stop with these as previously requested changeset/169617044

While I agree that 1916775 was overly complicated and I fixed it I do not agree with the rest, I personally find multipolygons easier to maintain and deal with for land use then areas, plus it minimizes the amount of duplicate faces in the land use. I will deal with any breakages my self. I will ensure that I check tools like osmi more often to check for these kinds of issues.

please stop doing the tasks below Dolphin Expressway (relation/192469) as the tasks between dolphin and US1 are going to be part of a task I have been working of creating for like 8 months now and the allot of the roads south of US 1 are not properly alignment yet and once pedestrian is added to an area it becomes at minimum twice as time consuming and complicated to fix road alignments, so please stop doing these.

When I try to view the file it tells me I don’t have access to it.

I have some issues with this, while I agree with the access changes, and I can't believe that I missed the bicycle=not specified when it was added, what you did to the pedestrian features at Southwest 104th Street and Southwest 72nd Avenue is very incorrect in my opinion. The reason for this, is that I try to map Miami Dade's pedestrian infra to a silver tier of geometry, that is what that intersection what mapped to, for more info see osm.wiki/Foundation/Local_Chapters/United_States/Pedestrian_Working_Group/Schemab . There is also the fact that crossings ways are only defined within the road area, mapping a crossing way into the sidewalk area is thus incorrect.

Thank you so much for the understanding,

Udar.

are you sure that these are service roads as this looks more like a residential development (last time I drove by (around a year ago)).

kerb vertexes should not be placed on sidewalk centerlines

kerb vertexes should not be placed on sidewalk centerlines

I don't know if local knowledge applies when you edited objects in multiple countries, so why did you change multiple shop=convenience to shop=tortilla, how do you know that those stores only sell tortilla's; if it's just the names I don't know if that is enough.

that vertex should be higher so that it is in the centerline.

this is directly on top of an already mapped gym, does this mean that the "Rumble" boxing gym is no longer there, if not is this on the second floor or what.

you linked the website for the miami dade county website, Miami dade county is a much larger area then Kendall so I um unsure if this is a good idea to use it for Kendall.

please respond

the two tags added to this object
"
addr:housenumber=400
name=ParkLine Miami South
"
simply do not give enough information about this object, from what I can tell from some cursory searches on duck duck go this seems to be a apartment so it would needs tags for that.

There is also the issue that you put source=survey on this even though you are adding other objects throughout the US that are also source survey so I am starting to doubt that, I would really like a more in depth explanation as to how you are finding all these objects throughout the US.

Your change set comment could also be better, for more info on that see osm.wiki/Good_changeset_comments .

Happy mapping,
Udar

Also we are not supposed to use short codes for road types like Blvd for Boulevard

This business is clearly inside of Coral Gables so the "addr:city" should be Coral Gables, it is on Ponce de Leon Boulevard as so that is what should be in the "addr:street" tag, these are also the same on the address database on the miami dade open data hub, see https://gis-mdc.opendata.arcgis.com/datasets/eef6b33da60d47c0964387960c840eea_0/explore?location=25.764140%2C-80.259731%2C18.88

It is also generally custom in OSM to only have single number in the "addr:unit" not something like "unit 4"
Also, phone numbers are supposed to be in the format of (in the US) "+1 XXX-XXX-XXXX" were the X's are single integers.

are you sure that "HoneyBee Doughnuts" no longer exists as you seem to contributing all over the place.

If you look at the website it has hours for pharmacy and "Rx in-store pickup" which tells you that it dispenses prescriptions, aka the need for the tag.

why did you remove dispensing=yes, the website indicates that you can get prescriptions here, I also do not see any issue with the healthcare and amenity tags.

why did you remove dispensing=yes, the website indicates that you can get prescriptions here, I also do not see any issue with the healthcare and amenity tags.