OpenStreetMap logo OpenStreetMap

Changeset When Comment
148356016

figured out the problem, 14678376 is one number of of 146783763 which is the correct commit id, I accidentally didn't select the whole id in the commit url copied and pasted but because it wasn't the whole id it caused issues.
again sorry for the inconvenience to those in Europa that this effects.

148356016

must have made a mistake when entering the commits to revert, reverting this, sorry for the commit

changeset/148356229

148177328

I have left multiple comments asking for why you made these changes and given you allot of time to respond, I have also left follow up comments to remind you of these issues and set you a private message though OSM. you have been completely unresponsive. since these edits are substantially erroneous I am reverting them. if you feel like any of this is wrong please feel free to comment, respond the the private message I sent you or otherwise contact me.

changeset/148356016

146783846

I have left multiple comments asking for why you made these changes and given you allot of time to respond, I have also left follow up comments to remind you of these issues and set you a private message though OSM. you have been completely unresponsive. since these edits are substantially erroneous I am reverting them. if you feel like any of this is wrong please feel free to comment, respond the the private message I sent you or otherwise contact me.

changeset/148356016

146342722

I have left multiple comments asking for why you made these changes and given you allot of time to respond, I have also left follow up comments to remind you of these issues and set you a private message though OSM. you have been completely unresponsive. since these edits are substantially erroneous I am reverting them. if you feel like any of this is wrong please feel free to comment, respond the the private message I sent you or otherwise contact me.

changeset/148356016

145539922

I have left multiple comments asking for why you made these changes and given you allot of time to respond, I have also left follow up comments to remind you of these issues and set you a private message though OSM. you have been completely unresponsive. since these edits are substantially erroneous I am reverting them. if you feel like any of this is wrong please feel free to comment, respond the the private message I sent you or otherwise contact me.

changeset/148356016

14678376

I have left multiple comments asking for why you made these changes and given you allot of time to respond, I have also left follow up comments to remind you of these issues and set you a private message though OSM. you have been completely unresponsive. since these edits are substantially erroneous I am reverting them. if you feel like any of this is wrong please feel free to comment, respond the the private message I sent you or otherwise contact me.

changeset/148356016

147995796

Please respond

147806764

can you see if your imagery shows and changes to the alignment of the HEFT Northwest 170th Street interchange their building (I already have some construction ways mapped based on what it seams the interchange will look like in the end (I seem to remember seeing somewhere that it will be a diverging diamond))

147995796

this was the old now abandoned rail line used by the FEC but does not represent the current service along that line. we already have mapped the Metrorail one of those ways is way/38917326 . why did you change this from abandoned, that was there for historical reasons.

148179480

also stop tagging ways as abandoned when there are only two options for those ways they become part of some other merge lane or stop existing altogether, that asphalt will not stay as is. it is not abandoned, it is simply under construction and thus should be tagged as such.

148179480

are you sure that https://i395-miami.com/ is an acceptable source, as in can it be used as a source. Ive known about it for a while but I'm not sure that it can be used as a source due to https://osmfoundation.org/wiki/Licence/Licence_Compatibility . What I'm trying to say is that I'm uncertain as to whether or not thats website is proprietary in such a way were its license wouldn't allow us to use it as a source here on OSM.

148177328

as a clarifying point if the13thsense reads this tracks aren't hiking trails they are mainly for of road vehicles see more at:

highway=track

148177328

actually now that I look at it this one would also likely need to be partial revert due to the fact that there are a few seemingly good access=private additions in this, what needs reverting here are the deletions of the tracks and possibly the edits to the power lines and poles

148177328

I was going to revert this and all the other ones I've tagged as bad and unresolved in OSMCha on Wednesday or Thursday (depending on my schedule) of the upcoming week since I still would like to give this individual 1 last chance to respond since I went ahead and sent them a message through OSM directly a few hours back, if you would like to do the revert earlier feel free to message me through OSM and I'll send you the list of commits I was going to revert, though some of them would need to be partial reverts.

148177328

again same question as changeset/146783763 why did you remove those tracks, they are on the latest imagery so that untill we get newer imagery or you physically survey the area from within yourself (or someone else does that) you cant just remove those. why did you remove them, it would be impossible to see all of those from any of the roads since the area is covered in pine rockland impeding views into the area. you either physically went into the area and saw with your own eyes that these had been removed or those edits should be reverted since there is no way you could have figured out whether or not they still exist without a thorough survey and if I remember that land is owned by Miami Dade so private citizens wouldn't be allowed inside.

If you dont respond quickly I will have to assume you didn't survey this as mentioned above and just removed them based on small amounts of information again as mentioned above and in the linked commit message, and revert this myself since has at this point become a pattern of yours. so please respond or fix in a timely manner, I have left you so many comments over the last few months with questions over commits.

148033258

I do remember that they changed the bus routes a bit around November 13 2023, and admittedly the mapping of bus routes I’m OSM is one of the areas I don’t have that much experience or knowledge on mapping so I don’t know how to figure out what the correct new alignments of bus routes are now. I also don’t have the time an money to take every rout and using a gps tracker app on my phone figure it out. I am planning to message drynwk about it since he seems to know more than me, I just haven’t gotten to that yet though I plan to at some point in the next week.

As a note Miami dades data can be a bit out of date at times (especially on the open data hub) so it may take them some time to get the new bus route up.

148033258

Also, what do you mean by “unlisted bus stops”?

148033258

Why did you tag 107 as tertiary link, links are only supposed to be used between two roads like a highway exit ramp. Its seems like that way should be residential to me but if you fell it’s tertiary then tag as that, its definitely not a link.

145539922

Please respond