Sorry it took me a day to get back to you,
I think highway=pedestrian is better tagging since these features represent the areas of sidewalks so they are pedestrian areas and if one were to add a new one in iD (or any other editor using the iD tagging schema) would add a new pedestrian area using the tags of area=yes and highway=pedestrian so that tag should stay. That’s why I didn’t change/remove the area:highway=pedestrian since the area*=* is technically correct so that’s why I feel it would be optimal to keep the tagging before this change.
Happy mapping

Sorry it took me a day to get back to you,
I think highway=pedestrian is better tagging since these features represent the areas of sidewalks so they are pedestrian areas and if one were to add a new one in iD (or any other editor using the iD tagging schema) would add a new pedestrian area using the tags of area=yes and highway=pedestrian so that tag should stay. That’s why I didn’t change/remove the area:highway=pedestrian since the area*=* is technically correct so that’s why I feel it would be optimal to keep the tagging before this change.
Happy mapping

Sorry it took me a day to get back to you,
I think highway=pedestrian is better tagging since these features represent the areas of sidewalks so they are pedestrian areas and if one were to add a new one in iD (or any other editor using the iD tagging schema) would add a new pedestrian area using the tags of area=yes and highway=pedestrian so that tag should stay. That’s why I didn’t change/remove the area:highway=pedestrian since the area*=* is technically correct so that’s why I feel it would be optimal to keep the tagging before this change.
Happy mapping

Sorry it took me a day to get back to you,
I think highway=pedestrian is better tagging since these features represent the areas of sidewalks so they are pedestrian areas and if one were to add a new one in iD (or any other editor using the iD tagging schema) would add a new pedestrian area using the tags of area=yes and highway=pedestrian so that tag should stay. That’s why I didn’t change/remove the area:highway=pedestrian since the area*=* is technically correct so that’s why I feel it would be optimal to keep the tagging before this change.
Happy mapping

Sorry it took me a day to get back to you,
I think highway=pedestrian is better tagging since these features represent the areas of sidewalks so they are pedestrian areas and if one were to add a new one in iD (or any other editor using the iD tagging schema) would add a new pedestrian area using the tags of area=yes and highway=pedestrian so that tag should stay. That’s why I didn’t change/remove the area:highway=pedestrian since the area*=* is technically correct so that’s why I feel it would be optimal to keep the tagging before this change.
Happy mapping

Quick question,
Is the atm added in this 1 atm for both Wells Fargo and Bank of America or does this represent 2 separate atm’s one Wells Fargo and the other Bank of America?
Happy mapping.

Please revert, see previous commit by your team with the exact same changes changeset/142847824
Essentially these are pedestrian areas and highway=pedestrian is required for that.

Please revert, see previous commit by your team with the exact same changes changeset/142847824
Essentially these are pedestrian areas and highway=pedestrian is required for that.

Please revert, see previous commit by your team with the exact same changes changeset/142847824
Essentially these are pedestrian areas and highway=pedestrian is required for that.

Please revert, see previous commit by your team with the exact same changes changeset/142847824
Essentially these are pedestrian areas and highway=pedestrian is required for that.

Please revert, see previous commit by your team with the exact same changes changeset/142847824
Essentially these are pedestrian areas and highway=pedestrian is required for that.

Please revert, see previous commit by your team with the exact same changes changeset/142847824
Essentially these are pedestrian areas and highway=pedestrian is required for that.

Please revert, see previous commit by your team with the exact same changes changeset/142847824
Essentially these are pedestrian areas and highway=pedestrian is required for that.

Please revert, see previous commit by your team with the exact same changes changeset/142847824
Essentially these are pedestrian areas and highway=pedestrian is required for that.

please respond

please respond

can you check if way way/1187974460 is multiple ways (each oneway=yes), since when I last passed by the site there seemed to be physically separated ways (separated by kerbs) for entrance and exit (though it was still under construction), it seems that this is were the entrance/exit gates for the apartment complex is.
thank you in advance,
happy mapping

Yes, please check next week, thank you so much for double checking for me.
Happy mapping.

Did you drive on the actual of road tracks or even go inside the area because I it think driving by on Krome Avenue or Southwest 167th Avenue would slow you to see the inner ones? I ask because they are there on the latest imagery.again based on the latest imagery these ways still exist, unless you went inside the farmland I doubt you could tell wether or not some of these ways were there or no since they are not visible from the paved roads on the sides if the farm land.
Please respond in a timely manner.

Did you drive on the actual of road tracks or even go inside the area because I it think driving by on Krome Avenue or Southwest 167th Avenue would slow you to see the inner ones? I ask because they are there on the latest imagery.again based on the latest imagery these ways still exist, unless you went inside the farmland I doubt you could tell wether or not some of these ways were there or no since they are not visible from the paved roads on the sides if the farm land.
Please respond in a timely manner.