Có quậy thì quậy cái gì hợp lý xíu? Bình Chánh là TP hồi nào vậy?

Có thể đừng sửa bậy nữa được không bạn?

Creating a historical boundary, and then make a note "THIS IS NOT A HISTORICAL BOUNDARY". What kind of contribution is this?

If you keep creating nonsense "historic boundaries" like this again, I'm afraid I'm gonna have to report you to the Volunteer Team.

You reverted other mappers’ contributions just because of your “obsession” with “historic” boundaries. And the “products” you left are hundreds of broken boundaries that people have to fix for you.

It is nonsense bc I don’t see any difference between your “Tỉnh Cao Bằng cũ” and the current Cao Bằng provincial boundaries, so I don’t really see the point of having “Tỉnh Cao Bằng cũ”. So is “Tỉnh Quảng Ninh cũ”.

I don't find such edits as being "dirty". On the other hand, I find your edits to be quite annoying.

Would you mind indicating which Satellite you used? "Esri World Imagery" clearly indicates a bridge here.

Cu Chi was never part of Tay Ninh, nor Can Gio be part of Ba Ria-Vung Tau. Previously I edited old HCMC to include these two districts, but you reverted this.

Please explain the reason for this. If I don’t see your response by tomorrow, I will proceed and delete all of these boundary=historic because they are clearly incorrect.

Can you explain the reason for assigning former Cu Chi district to former Tay Ninh province, and former Can Gio district to Ba Ria - Vung Tau? Keep in mind that boundary=historic is not meant for "creativity".

Do you mean they will automatically be imported to OHM based to the tag boundary=historic ?

Yes! And doesn’t that also agree with what you stated earlier (at least partially): “these boundaries will linger in people's mind for quite a long time (at least down to the districts)”

Mắc gì tên node cứ phải bỏ chữ "phường", "xã" vô chi vậy?

I think I made my point very clear:
*Old districts —> Yes, keep them as boundary=historic. And yes when I improve the boundaries, will also improve the old district boundaries.
*Old communes —> No, too many of them, most of which are not well-known.

Anyway, I will be drawing from the southern provinces northwards. It will probably take more than 2 years so I won’t be touching your beloved Quảng Ninh communes until then.

That you don’t have to worry about. If I delete it, I will definitely replace it with a better quality, more accurate boundary just a day later. Otherwise I’m not gonna even bother touching it 🙂

@phoenix Tính ra là đi chửi đổng mà đang tự include mình vô luôn đó =))))) Đã gọi là “war” thì nó đâu thể chỉ từ 1 phía mà thành war được đâu ha.

Also, please don’t take this personally but I found that the boundaries in Quảng Ninh and Hải Phòng that you drew, has pretty poor quality. After the communes merger, there will be less communes and thus take shorter time to draw, I was planning to help you redraw all boundaries in Quảng Ninh with better quality.

That would require deleting all of the existing boundary ways that you drew. But then you said you would be “depressed and frustrated” with that so I will have to rethink whether or not to do it.

“These boundaries will linger in people's mind for quite a long time (at least down to the districts)” —> Yes I totally agree, and given that the districts are mostly well known, and there are only 704 of them, it makes sense to keep them as boundary=historical.
But also keep 10k communes (including nearly 7k defunct), that is very IMPRACTICAL. Keeping them means you have to maintain them, if it is an existing commune then at least people will pay more attention to it and will notice sooner if it is vandalized. Defunct communes, most of which are not well-known, if vandalized, cannot be easily detected.

May I ask what “them” is in this context? Do you mean you wish to redraw all existing admin boundaries (704 districts and 10k communes)?

Districts no longer exists, so commune-level is technically level 6 now.