Eventually you will grow up and learn not to point fingers when you enter the house. Or maybe not :-)

Data consumers do not want change for the sake of change. The new schema you're forcing does not have ANY advantages. You will not be able to force such changes on larger countries as they also oppose such unprofessional actions. We are here for way more than you have been here and probably will be more than you will be.

And thus you're doing damage to data consumers, who are using waterway=riverbank for 15 years or more. Ok, this has already wasted too much of my time. DO NOT CHANGE ANYTHING in Lithuania. We want data QUALITY, not chaos created by clueless "unifiers".

No, you have changed a lot of objects which you have not fixed. And anyway, at the sime time you've decided that you, after spending less than a year in OSM, will force everybody else to use duplicate water tags instead of the ones we used for more than 15 years? Why?

The original is working very good and the new one does not add anything beneficial. General rule: do not touch things which work well and which you do not understand. Do not change things just in order to do some "change".

waterway=riverbank is a perfectly woriking tag and there is no "upgrade" for it.

Since some people start "fixing" stuff which is not broken before getting to know OSM.

And it is also said in wiki that water tags should NOT be changed just for the sake of changing it. You're not doing any improvement to the map, just going around and changing to tags with the same meaning.

The point is you are not "upgrading" any tags. You're just doing a pointless change removing tags which are perfectly fine. Therefore you're not doing anything good to this project.

You're breaking perfectly working tags. It is clearly stated in wiki that waterway=riverbank is a perfectly working tag which should not be changed. Reverted changes in Lithuania.

There is no such thing as highway=driveway, there is highway=service+service=driveway.
Ways should not cross each other without a node on the intersection (unless it is a bridge/tunnel). So this one must have had a connection to the path: way/911181936 (fixed that)

This road is not a service way/910780308 it is a footway.

Reviewed. Service road to the bank cannot start on footway, it is an automobile accesable road graph parto so should be connected to main road network (to Žirmūnų g.).
(Fixed that)

Reviewed. Looks fine.

IKI pastatui nereikia shop=supermarket žymos, nes viduje yra konkretus IKI taškas su supermarket. Priešingu atveju gautųsi du supermarketai.

Reviewed. Fixed forest/meadow topology error (overlapping polygons). Adjusted positions of objects (mapbox imagery has an offset from correct position, use ORT10LT for alignment).

Reviewed the changeset. Mostly ok. What is the meadow about? way/908877716. Mapbox satelite (as well as local info) shows a forest there.

Prie aukščiau pridėto tourism=viewpoint būtų gerai pridėti pavadinimą (name žymą), nes dabar neaišku, ką nurodytoje pozicijoje galima rasti.

Šiluvos poilsinio tako nebėra ar kaip? Vaikų žaidimo aikštelė tokiam objektui tikrai netinka. Kaip yra vietoje?

Čia yra įvažiavimas į kiemą (highway=service). Jis neturi pavadinimo.