hello GR-menneke, can you put these tags back? they give more info about the previous use of this highway. Thx
- - -
disused:service = spur
disused:usage = military
end_date = 2002
railway = disused

hello Jakka, user "GR-menneke" has deleted some "historical tags" such as
"disused:service=spur" and "disused:usage military" and "end_date" ... what has to be done/said?

new cycle track indeed since 2 weeks:
https://www.mapillary.com/map/im/H2waYDANxo6v4pvckTG23A
I added bicycle=no because cyclists are suposed to cycle on the birectional cycle path and not on the one-way street ...
the tag "bicycle=designated" is automatically set when you select "cycle path" in the online editor ... why is this a problem?

my mistake. I have been actualising a temporary diversion of the cycle highway F203 via there, and by accident I must have added also a cycle tag to the pedestrian crossing. Reverted in the meantime. Thanks again for your critical reviewing! ;-)

ok. Thanks for the correction/reminder! :-)

added the missing segments ... can you check if it is ok like this?

Waterstraat en Stelenseweg terug "open" gezet, Pas tussen Zonneke en Dokter Peetersstraat in construction.. Werken duren zeker tot Januari 2021, dus dat is in principe lang genoeg om het in "construction" te zetten

Hello,
I don't remember that I split these footways into small chunks.
I only remember that while I wanted to save my changes at Bd Whitlock I got the question/remark that this footway wasn't "crossing" the Bd Whithock "properly" (no connection or no tunnel or bridge). I added the tag "tunnel" cause I knew for sure it makes part of the underground premetro station "Georges Henri". Tell me if I did something wrong ...

last time I passed by there was 2 months ago ... according to "waze maps" it it still under construction, but I don't know if we can use that as a (reliable) "source" .. survey is in any case needed ...

good question :-) In Brussels you never know for sure if something is permanent or not ... but I think this one will be permanent (cf. small part of Wasmoesberg where the bar Mort Subite is situated)

I passed by there yesterday. The works are finished! I removed the construction tag and I restored the tag bicycle=use_sidepath on the road for cars

dank voor de info. Ik heb alle highways die op construction stonden, terug in hun initiële staat gezet ...

mijn excuses ... ik heb nog niet systematisch de reflex om te kijken naar de geschiedenis :-)
ik zal de surface op basis van de foto, ook al is die van 2017, aanpassen, want ik ben er vrij zeker van dat dit pad niet gebetonneerd is in de tussentijd ...

hallo, is dit pad ondertussen gebetonneerd?
https://www.mapillary.com/map/im/rjJxtPMEL47GhqVX3OOp1g

Dag Jo! :-)

Er zijn inderdaad "plannen" om de fietssnelweg tussen Sint-Martens-Bodegem en de grens met Brussel aan te leggen, maar deze zijn nog verre van concreet, laat staan dat er al werken zouden gestart zijn. Ik verwijder dus uw stukken in construction en laat de route lopen over bestaande parallele wegen, als die aanwezig zijn ...

is aangepast!

Dag Pieter,
Bij deze een kleine bedenking:
in de "umap-versie" van OSM viel het me op dat deze paden in het blauw zijn aangegeven: http://umap.openstreetmap.fr/nl/map/potentiele-fietsvoorsorteerstroken_452121#18/50.84631/4.34537

Ik ben gaan kijken bij de tags en ik zag daar staan dat ge zowel bij voetgangers als fietsers "designated" hebt staan.

Er staan effectief geen borden die de toegang tot het park regelen, dus in het extreme geval zouden hier zelfs wagens in mogen; https://www.mapillary.com/map/im/-0rHBhCyURBA5SdJHRKT9g

Maar bon, afgezien hiervan ben ik geneigd te zeggen dat het pad bedoeld is voor voetgangers, dus foot=designated effectief behouden, en dat fietsers toegelaten zijn, maar niet dat ze niet de "norm" zijn hier, dus daarom bicycle=yes ipv designated

Uw gedacht? :-)

thanks for your message! It's indeed surface=sett
I adapted it in the meantime!
by the way I just saw in the wiki that it's also called Belgian block, a pity that it's not retained as a tag.
In any case, thanks again for your feedback. It won't be probably my latest "mistake" you notice, but this last month I learnt a lot! :-)

thx it's clear like that, I deleted the 2 separate ways and added 1 way with the tag "highway=footway" and "footway=crossing" ... can you do a last check?
last thing: I tag the pavement for blind people separately, is it OK like this? -> "highway=footway", "footway=sidewalk" and "tactile_paing=contrasted"

hello, thanks for your message!
for the moment I'm still using the online editor yes ... but I have a meeting pending with Jo Decock to get an introduction to JOSM ... :-)
concerning your comments:
1) I don't understand what you mean with "two separate ways for a crossing" ... or is it that a "crossing" only needs to be tagged as a "node" and not via a "line"?
2) so only "highway=footway" and "footway=crossing"?

Could you give me a good example I can rely on?