Ik heb deze changesets voor nu teruggedraait, omdat het mij lijkt dat deze meer kapot hebben gemaakt dan dat ze oplossen.

changeset/174722820

way/1288215070
En deze weg gaat dus niet meer door tot de Professor Goossenslaan?

Hallo Adrie Stoopen,

Waarom heb je hier deze stukken gras verwijdert? Ik kan deze nog op de satelliet beelden terugzien.
way/594938529
way/594940131
way/594940137

Ook heb je hier een pad/trap verwijdert die ik nog terug kan vinden. way/542090892

Is dit allemaal recent verwijdert?

Hallo Adrie Stoopen,

Dus de bomen aan de zijkant en dat pad daar bovenaan zijn ook weg?

En ik zie dat je de vorm van het gebouw hebt aangepast. Waarom?

Groeten,
Taya Snijder

Hello emilmaks,

I have reverted your deletions. On OSM it is perfectly acceptable to map features others might deem as not critical or necessary. As long as the object actually exists, it can be mapped.

Deleting objects that you do not wish to see on the map, whether you believe it to be a burden, clutter, unnecessary, or optional, is not a valid reason.

Best regards,
Taya Snijder,
On behalf of the OSMF Data Working Group

changeset/174644647

Hello,

I had a question. Whose 'user reports' are these? Where does this data come from? How was it verified?

Best regards,
Taya Snijder

changeset/174368378

Hello Michael,

Thanks for pointing those out to me. No, I did not intent to leave those there. It seems that some of the objects that were edited twice weren't reverted correctly. I'll make sure to clean those up either this evening or sometime tomorrow.

Best regards,
Taya Snijder

May I also remind you of this paragraph of the Automated Edits Code of Conduct:

The purpose of this policy is to avoid the database being damaged. Be very aware that it can be hard or impossible to revert or 'roll back' inappropriate edits, particularly where further edits have been made to features touched by the changes and careless automated edits can therefore create considerable work for other parties to repair the damage. Ignoring this policy will be treated as vandalism and will be responded to as such if it persists.

Reverted in changeset/174330042

Reverted in changeset/174330042

Reverted in changeset/174330042

Reverted in changeset/174330042

Reverted in changeset/174330042

Reverted in changeset/174330042

Reverted in changeset/174330042

Reverted in changeset/174330042

Reverted in changeset/174330042

Reverted in changeset/174330042

Reverted in changeset/174330042