OpenStreetMap logo OpenStreetMap

Changeset When Comment
154756540

Hello, I have reverted this changeset. private properties can be mapped on OSM with no issues. See this wiki page for more information: osm.wiki/Why_we_won%27t_delete_roads_on_private_property

The best way to indicate that a road is private is to add access=private. The mass removal of features that are present on the ground is not acceptable.

changeset/154772092

154756523

Hello, I have reverted this changeset. private properties can be mapped on OSM with no issues. See this wiki page for more information: osm.wiki/Why_we_won%27t_delete_roads_on_private_property

The best way to indicate that a road is private is to add access=private. The mass removal of features that are present on the ground is not acceptable.

changeset/154772092

154756512

Hello, I have reverted this changeset. private properties can be mapped on OSM with no issues. See this wiki page for more information: osm.wiki/Why_we_won%27t_delete_roads_on_private_property

The best way to indicate that a road is private is to add access=private. The mass removal of features that are present on the ground is not acceptable.

changeset/154772092

154756507

Hello, I have reverted this changeset. private properties can be mapped on OSM with no issues. See this wiki page for more information: osm.wiki/Why_we_won%27t_delete_roads_on_private_property

The best way to indicate that a road is private is to add access=private. The mass removal of features that are present on the ground is not acceptable.

changeset/154772092

154756321

Hello, I have reverted this changeset. private properties can be mapped on OSM with no issues. See this wiki page for more information: osm.wiki/Why_we_won%27t_delete_roads_on_private_property

The best way to indicate that a road is private is to add access=private. The mass removal of features that are present on the ground is not acceptable.

changeset/154772092

154756238

Hello, I have reverted this changeset. private properties can be mapped on OSM with no issues. See this wiki page for more information: osm.wiki/Why_we_won%27t_delete_roads_on_private_property

The best way to indicate that a road is private is to add access=private. The mass removal of features that are present on the ground is not acceptable.

changeset/154772092

154756003

Hello, I have reverted this changeset. private properties can be mapped on OSM with no issues. See this wiki page for more information: osm.wiki/Why_we_won%27t_delete_roads_on_private_property

The best way to indicate that a road is private is to add access=private. The mass removal of features that are present on the ground is not acceptable.

changeset/154772092

154746134

Hello, I have reverted this changeset. private properties can be mapped on OSM with no issues. See this wiki page for more information: osm.wiki/Why_we_won%27t_delete_roads_on_private_property

The best way to indicate that a road is private is to add access=private. The mass removal of features that are present on the ground is not acceptable.

changeset/154772092

154746053

Hello, I have reverted this changeset. private properties can be mapped on OSM with no issues. See this wiki page for more information: osm.wiki/Why_we_won%27t_delete_roads_on_private_property

The best way to indicate that a road is private is to add access=private. The mass removal of features that are present on the ground is not acceptable.

changeset/154772092

154664836

changeset message was supposed to be: added wikidata tags

154509248

Hello, when adding changeset comments, please use this guide: osm.wiki/Good_changeset_comments

Changeset comments are meant to inform other users what your changeset did. A comment like "1 object(s) created." explains nothing to other users. Instead consider explaining what you added/changed/deleted. In this case something like "added bench" would have been much clearer.

Sincerely,
Taya

154483105

I do not see this quarry on any of the aerials. Do you have a source for this?

154489589

I have reverted the changes you made to the salt ponds. You even incorrectly retagged a bunch of the intermittent water basins to salt ponds.

154489589

Why did you remove the water related tags from the salt ponds? This is not correct as they still contain intermittent water

133717565

Deze gebruiker heeft hier weer highway=primary aan toegevoegd changeset/154247026

154103853

AUB ook niet dit soort dingen als scrub taggen way/1151610223 Hier kun je prima doorheen lopen, dus dit zal zeker geen scrub zijn
Groeten,
Taya

153599260

Scrub word gebruikt voor houtachtige planten die groter zijn dan heide en kleiner dan bomen. Je kunt hier meer over lezen op de OSM wiki natural=scrub (Ook word dit in nederland gebruikt voor duingebieden. )
Lang gras tussen weilanden zal geen scrub zijn. Dit is beter getagged als natural=grassland of landuse=gras.

Hier overlapt de scrub die je hebt toegevoegd met de weilanden. Dit is incorrect.
way/1299344900
way/108943798
Ga jij dit ook nog fixen?

154109450

Leer asljeblieft een keer je edits te controleren. Iedere keer is het weer raak. het is niet de bedoeling dat anderen hun tijd moeten blijven verspillen om jouw fouten op te lossen.

way/54635030
way/54635523
way/1302267539
way/1302267541
way/1302261519

154017940

Hi, out of courtasy to others, please try to use English or the local language when editing in other countries.

153983664

Thank you! One moment you spot some interesting coastal wetlands, and the next you're months in to a single project.