OpenStreetMap logo OpenStreetMap

Changeset When Comment
176674180

Reverted data imported from Google

changeset/178456174

176674110

Reverted data imported from Google

changeset/178456174

176673954

Reverted data imported from Google

changeset/178456174

178368013

Reverted fantasy edits/destructive edits

changeset/178445104

178367448

Reverted fantasy edits/destructive edits

changeset/178445104

178271257

Reverted fantasy edits/destructive edits

changeset/178445104

178271190

Reverted fantasy edits/destructive edits

changeset/178445104

178270803

Reverted fantasy edits/destructive edits

changeset/178445104

178269509

Reverted fantasy edits/destructive edits

changeset/178445104

178269430

Reverted fantasy edits/destructive edits

changeset/178445104

178367561

Hello Geopartner,

This changeset simply says "created_by=Geopartner" instead of the usual "created_by=JOSM/1.5 (19439 en)" if one were to use JOSM. There is also no source cited here or in any of your other edits. Please make sure to always cite where the data comes from. If this is an import, please make sure you follow the import requirements as listed in osm.wiki/Import/Guidelines

Best regards,
Taya Snijder

178428572

You mixed up a changeset ID with a node ID
changeset/178428496

178428572

The usual culprit of these nodes getting dragged halfway across the planet is someone deciding to make their own editor and mixing up nodes and ways with the same ID, but that doesn't seem to be the case this time. Regardless, please figure out what went wrong and fix your editor.

If you need a place to test, use the dev server, not the live one. https://master.apis.dev.openstreetmap.org/

Best regards,
Taya Snijder

178428572

Reverted yet another changeset that dragged a node halfway across the globe

changeset/178443236

178413192

Hello,

On OSM the coastline is mapped at the mean high water line (high tide). In some sections you've moved the coastline well into the intertidal zone. Please take care to map the coastline in the right place. Using multiple different sets of imagery often helps nail down the coastline when visual clues alone aren't enough.

Best regards,
Taya Snijder

178407913

Hi, please be careful when editing. You just changed all of Lake Ontario into a wetland.

Best regards,
Taya Snijder

178344636

(That was the incorrect continent node, the correct one is openstreetmap.org/node/12098430255)

178344636

Place=continent is only used 9 times, and only as node. Plus there already exists a (somewhat questionable) Australia continent node node/1209843025

But how did you think that an area that only consists of mainland Australia could represent a continent? Is Tasmania not part of the Australian Continent? What happened to Papua New Guinea (and should it be the entire island, or just half of it)?

The only reason this is tagged like this is because people disagree with calling it a place=island. Not so that someone who has already thoroughly been told why attempting to clearly define the geographical shapes of continents is a bad idea (https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/america-relation/136587) can just go around and retag it without doing even an ounce of research into what people even consider 'the continent of Australia' to be.

If you want to go and clearly figure out and describe what a boundary=land_area is, go ahead, good idea. But don't just change tags that you don't understand.

178344636

Why do you keep constantly making these big undiscussed and badly thought out changes to places on the other side of the world from you? I have reverted this changeset.

changeset/178394794

178369402

*node, not a way