OpenStreetMap
Taya_S's Comments
| Changeset | When | Comment |
|---|---|---|
| 154756824 | Hello, I have reverted this changeset. private properties can be mapped on OSM with no issues. See this wiki page for more information: osm.wiki/Why_we_won%27t_delete_roads_on_private_property The best way to indicate that a road is private is to add access=private. The mass removal of features that are present on the ground is not acceptable. |
|
| 154756816 | Hello, I have reverted this changeset. private properties can be mapped on OSM with no issues. See this wiki page for more information: osm.wiki/Why_we_won%27t_delete_roads_on_private_property The best way to indicate that a road is private is to add access=private. The mass removal of features that are present on the ground is not acceptable. |
|
| 154756745 | Hello, I have reverted this changeset. private properties can be mapped on OSM with no issues. See this wiki page for more information: osm.wiki/Why_we_won%27t_delete_roads_on_private_property The best way to indicate that a road is private is to add access=private. The mass removal of features that are present on the ground is not acceptable. |
|
| 154756733 | Hello, I have reverted this changeset. private properties can be mapped on OSM with no issues. See this wiki page for more information: osm.wiki/Why_we_won%27t_delete_roads_on_private_property The best way to indicate that a road is private is to add access=private. The mass removal of features that are present on the ground is not acceptable. |
|
| 154756670 | Hello, I have reverted this changeset. private properties can be mapped on OSM with no issues. See this wiki page for more information: osm.wiki/Why_we_won%27t_delete_roads_on_private_property The best way to indicate that a road is private is to add access=private. The mass removal of features that are present on the ground is not acceptable. |
|
| 154756610 | Hello, I have reverted this changeset. private properties can be mapped on OSM with no issues. See this wiki page for more information: osm.wiki/Why_we_won%27t_delete_roads_on_private_property The best way to indicate that a road is private is to add access=private. The mass removal of features that are present on the ground is not acceptable. |
|
| 154756540 | Hello, I have reverted this changeset. private properties can be mapped on OSM with no issues. See this wiki page for more information: osm.wiki/Why_we_won%27t_delete_roads_on_private_property The best way to indicate that a road is private is to add access=private. The mass removal of features that are present on the ground is not acceptable. |
|
| 154756523 | Hello, I have reverted this changeset. private properties can be mapped on OSM with no issues. See this wiki page for more information: osm.wiki/Why_we_won%27t_delete_roads_on_private_property The best way to indicate that a road is private is to add access=private. The mass removal of features that are present on the ground is not acceptable. |
|
| 154756512 | Hello, I have reverted this changeset. private properties can be mapped on OSM with no issues. See this wiki page for more information: osm.wiki/Why_we_won%27t_delete_roads_on_private_property The best way to indicate that a road is private is to add access=private. The mass removal of features that are present on the ground is not acceptable. |
|
| 154756507 | Hello, I have reverted this changeset. private properties can be mapped on OSM with no issues. See this wiki page for more information: osm.wiki/Why_we_won%27t_delete_roads_on_private_property The best way to indicate that a road is private is to add access=private. The mass removal of features that are present on the ground is not acceptable. |
|
| 154756321 | Hello, I have reverted this changeset. private properties can be mapped on OSM with no issues. See this wiki page for more information: osm.wiki/Why_we_won%27t_delete_roads_on_private_property The best way to indicate that a road is private is to add access=private. The mass removal of features that are present on the ground is not acceptable. |
|
| 154756238 | Hello, I have reverted this changeset. private properties can be mapped on OSM with no issues. See this wiki page for more information: osm.wiki/Why_we_won%27t_delete_roads_on_private_property The best way to indicate that a road is private is to add access=private. The mass removal of features that are present on the ground is not acceptable. |
|
| 154756003 | Hello, I have reverted this changeset. private properties can be mapped on OSM with no issues. See this wiki page for more information: osm.wiki/Why_we_won%27t_delete_roads_on_private_property The best way to indicate that a road is private is to add access=private. The mass removal of features that are present on the ground is not acceptable. |
|
| 154746134 | Hello, I have reverted this changeset. private properties can be mapped on OSM with no issues. See this wiki page for more information: osm.wiki/Why_we_won%27t_delete_roads_on_private_property The best way to indicate that a road is private is to add access=private. The mass removal of features that are present on the ground is not acceptable. |
|
| 154746053 | Hello, I have reverted this changeset. private properties can be mapped on OSM with no issues. See this wiki page for more information: osm.wiki/Why_we_won%27t_delete_roads_on_private_property The best way to indicate that a road is private is to add access=private. The mass removal of features that are present on the ground is not acceptable. |
|
| 154664836 | changeset message was supposed to be: added wikidata tags |
|
| 154509248 | Hello, when adding changeset comments, please use this guide: osm.wiki/Good_changeset_comments Changeset comments are meant to inform other users what your changeset did. A comment like "1 object(s) created." explains nothing to other users. Instead consider explaining what you added/changed/deleted. In this case something like "added bench" would have been much clearer. Sincerely,
|
|
| 154483105 | I do not see this quarry on any of the aerials. Do you have a source for this? |
|
| 154489589 | I have reverted the changes you made to the salt ponds. You even incorrectly retagged a bunch of the intermittent water basins to salt ponds. |
|
| 154489589 | Why did you remove the water related tags from the salt ponds? This is not correct as they still contain intermittent water |