Taya_S's Comments
| Changeset | When | Comment |
|---|---|---|
| 154756540 | Hello, I have reverted this changeset. private properties can be mapped on OSM with no issues. See this wiki page for more information: osm.wiki/Why_we_won%27t_delete_roads_on_private_property The best way to indicate that a road is private is to add access=private. The mass removal of features that are present on the ground is not acceptable. |
|
| 154756523 | Hello, I have reverted this changeset. private properties can be mapped on OSM with no issues. See this wiki page for more information: osm.wiki/Why_we_won%27t_delete_roads_on_private_property The best way to indicate that a road is private is to add access=private. The mass removal of features that are present on the ground is not acceptable. |
|
| 154756512 | Hello, I have reverted this changeset. private properties can be mapped on OSM with no issues. See this wiki page for more information: osm.wiki/Why_we_won%27t_delete_roads_on_private_property The best way to indicate that a road is private is to add access=private. The mass removal of features that are present on the ground is not acceptable. |
|
| 154756507 | Hello, I have reverted this changeset. private properties can be mapped on OSM with no issues. See this wiki page for more information: osm.wiki/Why_we_won%27t_delete_roads_on_private_property The best way to indicate that a road is private is to add access=private. The mass removal of features that are present on the ground is not acceptable. |
|
| 154756321 | Hello, I have reverted this changeset. private properties can be mapped on OSM with no issues. See this wiki page for more information: osm.wiki/Why_we_won%27t_delete_roads_on_private_property The best way to indicate that a road is private is to add access=private. The mass removal of features that are present on the ground is not acceptable. |
|
| 154756238 | Hello, I have reverted this changeset. private properties can be mapped on OSM with no issues. See this wiki page for more information: osm.wiki/Why_we_won%27t_delete_roads_on_private_property The best way to indicate that a road is private is to add access=private. The mass removal of features that are present on the ground is not acceptable. |
|
| 154756003 | Hello, I have reverted this changeset. private properties can be mapped on OSM with no issues. See this wiki page for more information: osm.wiki/Why_we_won%27t_delete_roads_on_private_property The best way to indicate that a road is private is to add access=private. The mass removal of features that are present on the ground is not acceptable. |
|
| 154746134 | Hello, I have reverted this changeset. private properties can be mapped on OSM with no issues. See this wiki page for more information: osm.wiki/Why_we_won%27t_delete_roads_on_private_property The best way to indicate that a road is private is to add access=private. The mass removal of features that are present on the ground is not acceptable. |
|
| 154746053 | Hello, I have reverted this changeset. private properties can be mapped on OSM with no issues. See this wiki page for more information: osm.wiki/Why_we_won%27t_delete_roads_on_private_property The best way to indicate that a road is private is to add access=private. The mass removal of features that are present on the ground is not acceptable. |
|
| 154664836 | changeset message was supposed to be: added wikidata tags |
|
| 154509248 | Hello, when adding changeset comments, please use this guide: osm.wiki/Good_changeset_comments Changeset comments are meant to inform other users what your changeset did. A comment like "1 object(s) created." explains nothing to other users. Instead consider explaining what you added/changed/deleted. In this case something like "added bench" would have been much clearer. Sincerely,
|
|
| 154483105 | I do not see this quarry on any of the aerials. Do you have a source for this? |
|
| 154489589 | I have reverted the changes you made to the salt ponds. You even incorrectly retagged a bunch of the intermittent water basins to salt ponds. |
|
| 154489589 | Why did you remove the water related tags from the salt ponds? This is not correct as they still contain intermittent water |
|
| 133717565 | Deze gebruiker heeft hier weer highway=primary aan toegevoegd changeset/154247026 |
|
| 154103853 | AUB ook niet dit soort dingen als scrub taggen way/1151610223 Hier kun je prima doorheen lopen, dus dit zal zeker geen scrub zijn
|
|
| 153599260 | Scrub word gebruikt voor houtachtige planten die groter zijn dan heide en kleiner dan bomen. Je kunt hier meer over lezen op de OSM wiki natural=scrub (Ook word dit in nederland gebruikt voor duingebieden. )
Hier overlapt de scrub die je hebt toegevoegd met de weilanden. Dit is incorrect.
|
|
| 154109450 | Leer asljeblieft een keer je edits te controleren. Iedere keer is het weer raak. het is niet de bedoeling dat anderen hun tijd moeten blijven verspillen om jouw fouten op te lossen. way/54635030
|
|
| 154017940 | Hi, out of courtasy to others, please try to use English or the local language when editing in other countries. |
|
| 153983664 | Thank you! One moment you spot some interesting coastal wetlands, and the next you're months in to a single project. |