Hi,

By making this roundabout a full circle you’ve affected destination relation that it has. In the future please be careful of the relations that you are potentially braking when combining/splitting ways (destination_sign, turn_restriction..).
I also don't think all roundabouts should be made a single way. Some roundabouts tend to have different lane information and by combining all ways into one, data will be lost.

Best,
Tara

Hi,
By combining a roundabout into a full circle (way/432565972 ) you have affected destination_sign relations on it that are now incorrect. In the future please look out for all relations (destination_sign; turn_restrictions…) when combining/splitting ways.
Also, I am not sure that roundabouts in general should be merged. Some roundabouts have valuable lane information on ways that can be different depending on the change of lanes in one roundabout.

Best,
Tara

Hi,
I am not sure that all roundabouts should be merged into a single way just for the sake of bus routes going through them. Some roundabouts have valuable lane information on ways that can be different depending on the change of lanes in one roundabout.
Maybe a better solution would be just to add and arrange the previously split ways of roundabouts into a bus route relation rather than combining ways and potentially losing data?

Best,
Tara

Hi,
By combining a roundabout into full circle (way/721984805#map=19/-36.14047/144.72970 ) you have affected destination_sign relations on it that are now incorrect. In the future please look out for all relations (destination_sign; turn_restrictions…) when combining/splitting ways.
Also, I am not sure that all roundabouts should be merged just for the sake of routes going through them. Some roundabouts have valuable lane information on ways that can be different depending on the change of lanes in one roundabout.

Best,
Tara

Thanks for letting me know!
For some reason it did not download that link properly for the first time. I've deleted my edit from today so there are no double ways.

Kind regards,
Tara

Since the Snowy White River is a long one, I have drawn the multipolygon with several segments. In process of continuing and drawing the further segment I have forgotten to delete this way. It has been corrected. Thanks!

The name of the De Grey River was already placed on the waterway river. Since I was editing the riverbank of the same river it made since for the multipolygon of the riverbank to have the same name as the river itself.
But since I do not have the source to verify whether name of the river is actually correct I have removed the name tag from the relation so it would not cause any confusion. Thanks!

Thank you for letting me know. I have corrected the mistake.

Hi,
Based on government data, Mapillary imagery, and the classification of the roads nearby, should the classification of this road be secondary instead of primary? (Meandarra-Talwood Road and Meandarra-Condamine Road)

Kind regards,
Tara

Correction - government data used: data.sa.gov.au

Correction - government data used: data.sa.gov.au

Correction - government data used: data.sa.gov.au

Correction - government data used: data.sa.gov.au

This road is classified as primary, but based on Mapillary images (https://www.mapillary.com/app/?focus=photo&lat=-37.519621799999996&lng=145.42469149997225&z=20&pKey=5pgY3Ynk6c1SRvCr4lLZlw ) it can be classified as trunk? Should the classification of this road be changed?

Used NC Latest Imagery and TIGER Roads 2018 as sources as well.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/70760162

I will keep that in mind.
Thank you!

Tara

Hi,
I used QSL as an abbreviation for the state of Queensland in Australia, since I am mostly mapping there.
Hope it's more clear now. :)

Correction: In the region of WA

A typo was made in the description. It is Adding missing street names in WA.

Thank you very much!
If you have any input regarding mistakes or mapping Australia in general, please let me know. :)