I'll be opposed to retaining Halsema as trunk. Ideally, that forms the shortest route between Baguio and Tuguegarao from the map, but that's not the case of the ground (that goes to Route 110. Also questionable if there's going to be closure due to landslide.

Concurrently, I also oppose keeping the existing primary network as they mostly serve small towns in a largely sparsely populated area. Cordillera already lacks rural secondaries (many of the primaries better fall under that class).

Fine with the downgrades along coastal Cavite, but not the upgrade to Diokno and Route 436 (not ideal trunk due to jogs). Don't be rash!

Correction: should be "[Solano, Nueva Vizcaya/Santiago City] review and correct/undo Road reclassifications, move trunk to partially opened bypass
"

That's fine in a town with large enough roads, but that's not the case in most of the Philippines. Just reviewed and fixed some of these.

Just wondering why downgrade Andaya? Redundant with Maharlika Highway?

Just partially undone or fixed the classifications here. Why would you upgrade lots of road to secondary? I noticed this and related edits lately.

I can't understand clearly what you want to say, but again, do away with your habit here to map every closure. You're saying SRIT-Davao is closed until further notice, which is not clear, and in short, unpredictable. I'm OK with a long-term closure with known end date, e.g. road under reconstruction, though it may not always be the case.

Reverted route deactivations (plus others you've tagged as such). Better not reflect very unpredictable route closure due to typhoon or quarantine, and those don't often get updated.

This edit has been reviewed and reverted. POI deleted already exists; just replaced by new one.

This edit has been reviewed and partially reverted due to unexplained deletion. Features deleted already exist, but replaced by low-quality or duplicate ones.

This edit has been reviewed and partially reverted due to unexplained deletion. Features deleted already exist, but replaced by low-quality ones.

My thoughts here, I'll still see Route 51 Santiago-Tuguegarao as trunk as an equally important link between Santiago and Tuguegarao. Primary may be fine, noting the lack of primaries west of Maharlika Highway, but I’n not convinced. Better shifting the Baguio-Tuguegarao trunk route from the way via Bontoc and Tabuk to Route 110 Benguet-Nueva Vizcaya (rest on Maharlika Highway and Route 51).

Ngah, you again! Not that too wordy! But, this is completely suspicious.

I don't understand what he means in his comment, but this kind of comment (especially those saying "seen this") is one of his MO. Just to note, this one is of sock of a long-term vandal; don't get fooled.

Just a note, please avoid tagging short-term closures. It's tempting to map them, but remember features may not be frequently updated and OSM data is also used by map/nav apps for offline use. Such closures are better handled by those apps, not the main map.

To give you an idea why primary routings need to be determined carefully, you might want to look in the maps of large US cities like LA or New York, where they do have a lot too many primary roads. The local communities have set newer guidelines for primary roads in dense areas or large cities, and there are plans already to reclassify some of those to secondary depending on factors like construction and traffic volumes.

I'm not very convinced Macapagal should be primary, considering it's mostly local traffic and it's fairly too close to Roxas Boulevard. I agree Ayala and Lawton should be kept secondary; being main accesses to CBDs is irrelevant and there are even larger roads that are more important for traffic. Also in a very dense area like Metro Manila, what gets primary needs to determined carefully.

Fine by me, but I would like to keep those roads as primary with the rather sparse primary network there until some time. Also, between Antipolo and Tayabas, most traffic is between the towns, and some sections narrow and winding. I'll also look into your edit on Marcos Highway.

But that's not always the case. There should be any signs it's restricted (sticker required, visitors must sign and present ID), but the case of BF Resort seems to be on the permissive one. Someone local should check.

Been to BF Resort?