I don't think so, especially for the Lucena-bound buses. Where did you get that night-time routing through Poblacion/daytime routing through bypass in Candelaria?

Thanks. It's almost correct, except that segment through Santa Maria. Haven't TTP a while to use recent Sentinel-2 image.

Please don't remove the bus stop names. These can be found in the onboard announcements. Better remove closed stops (affected by 2021 network redesign, or the Valley Line).

Roads have been already mapped here so please be careful.

Geographically speaking, it's still part of Quezon Province, but the admin_level tag speaks about political territory. Lucena is not under Quezon Province jurisdiction, even if it's still the capital.

Lucena is still capital of Quezon Province (admin_level=4), but it's no longer under its jurisdiction (Lucena is highly urbanized city). Please undo.

The bypass is still relatively new and most traffic is bus or truck, but whether trunk should be moved back to Poblacion route needs to be discussed first.

Fewer vehicles taking the bypass talaga?

Reminder lang, di dapat ibinabase sa functional Class ng DPWH ang classification dito. Ngayon, dumami ang primary dito. Please stop!

Please, stop this massive classification changes. It's so rash. Not even a good justification. And what I’m seeing is align ing DPWH classification with OSM classification. They don't match. I'll revert.

Please be careful!
3-digit highway number is not necessarily a good indicator of primary status. Between Pasig and Taguig, C-5 is better. To revert this and your other contentious Road classification changes.

May alam ba kayo sa lugar? Pinuntahan nyo ba? Sa totoo lang, mukhang bawal po yung ginagawa nyo.

Hi po, Nestor

Ano'ng source para sa pangalan ng mga kalye? Personal nyo bang pinuntahan yung mga lugar o kinopya nyo lang mula sa ibang mapa o ibang source na di pwedeng pagkunan ng data para sa OSM?

Route 70 is a trunk route between Tacloban and Ormoc. Please undo this change.

Also don't forget removing verifying presence of concrete barrier on busway from Estrella to MOA. Some sections are separated only by painted yellow line(s) (sometimes mistaken for concrete barrier when mapping from aerial photo, as previous mapping of GenSan-Koronadal as divided), that are better tagged as lane change restriction. Check also latest Mapillary.

You've just renamed your account from "Franswa Belhadí", but what's all your reason for adding lots of Spanish names? Some of them cannot be proven, especially ones involving highways generically named "National Road/Highway".

(Machine translation)

Acabas de cambiar el nombre de tu cuenta de "Franswa Belhadí", pero ¿cuál es la razón por la que agregas muchos nombres en español? Algunas de ellas no pueden ser probadas, especialmente las que involucran carreteras denominadas genéricamente "National Road/Highway" (en inglés).

Why mark these proposed roads as under construction? Wondering why.

(Just missed a few more words) On bike lanes, these should be mostly a road attribute, not a separate way. I’ve been remapping a lot of those which has been mapped separately but is not separated by physical barrier. Please remap the EDSA bike lanes; these should be at best tagged as road attribute.

I'm not a fan of mapping sidewalks as separate ways and we generally do not do that here in the Philippines, but yes, we can have an exception if it's separated by impassable barrier (usually railing) or boulevard/grass strip.

On bike lanes, these should be mostly a road attribute, not a separate way. I’ve been remapping a lot of those which has been. Please remap the EDSA bike lanes; these should be at best tagged as road attribute.

Off-topic, but also related to your mapping of present EDSA is some problems with mapping Busway. There's actually no separated bus lane south of Estrella, and existing mapping is inaccurate.

Edit has been partially reverted as there is no aerial imagery to prove there is construction ongoing.