SuborbitalPigeon's Comments
| Changeset | When | Comment |
|---|---|---|
| 141788023 | Not at all. It's not a physical feature, should not be in the database. |
|
| 141788023 | Is this a real thing, or just a filming location. If the latter, please remove it again. |
|
| 142670251 | What do you mean by "check name spelling". OSM doesn't use double entry accounting. |
|
| 142670283 | When you use a wikipedia tag, you prepend which language it's in. In order to get the same article in another language, you'd need to go via wikidata anyway. Personally, I'm in favour of not duplicating information, so removing wikipedia links makes sense to me |
|
| 142670283 | The wikidata UI isn't really the point though, it's the information that's there that's important. It gives additional information in standardised form, just like OSM tags in the first place |
|
| 142670283 | The advantage of wikidata data is that they're not linking to an article in a specific language. Wikidata entries area always linked to the wikipedia articles anyway. |
|
| 142593623 | The 'name' tag should not have multiple languages in it. Please see name=*?uselang=en-GB |
|
| 134181102 | Do NOT vandalise the map |
|
| 72490380 | Finally got new geometry from aerial images. Visited today, rather nice place |
|
| 72490380 | sounds like a plan |
|
| 72490380 | not really, I think it's rotated a bit (don't remember which way) and further from the road. I don't live up that way so I can't visit I'm afraid |
|
| 72490380 | It is no longer anything aside from a house, in fact I think the building shown on the map no longer has the same geometry |
|
| 76796107 | Yup, I was unsure of the location because I did this from a bit of a distance away and estimation |
|
| 72490380 | I'll have a look over the next few days, it used to be a nice cafe and I noticed it was basically a new house in July |
|
| 58828096 | Feel free to revert if you want to, but you'll need to get rid of the advertising in the description tag and also add some other tags (like what the businesses actually are). But these are clearly spam bots, so I'd rather not trust any data they come up with is accurate. |
|
| 58822489 | Spam |
|
| 54682467 | ||
| 54682467 | Oh crap, no I didn't. Will fix now |
|
| 45571740 | It looks like it, the aerial imagery was too old, but it would appear someone updated the layout to the current one |
|
| 45571740 | No worries, I actually forgot about the note, so thanks for reminding me! |