Is Heartland Expressway explicitly signed as such? Otherwise official_name would be better.

Yes, work has begun! About time.

That's above my technical level. Best I've got is future_ref=

I think you may have jumped the gun a bit here; this approval was just announced by NDOT (it's been submitted and rejected for years) and isn't going to be implemented until spring. https://dot.nebraska.gov/media/5yxdus45/20260210-d8-hwyrenumbering.pdf

Hastings is well-signed (and just replaced a bunch with newer signs not too long ago). GI and Columbus last I looked were poorly signed but more than US 30 in Fremont, which I have only found evidence at the termini pre-completion of the US 30 project and no remaining signs through Fremont itself.

There used to be a few more, including where it curved north to follow what was US 77 and along that corridor and at the south side where it began at the terminus of N-36. Glancing at street-level imagery, it does appear that most of those signs have been removed, as well as most of the BUS US 30 signs. Should I go ahead and remove that one as well?

I don't know how familiar you are with Nebraska business routes, but they are strictly locally operated, to the extent that the state will not acknowledge them on their signs. As a result, they don't appear in the state highway logbook and are hard to find official documentation on. There's only a handful left in the state (US 20 in S Sioux City, US 6 in Hastings, US 30 in Columbus, N-2 in GI and Neb City, and US 75 in Neb City). I think Norfolk killed US 275 BUS, and I might go and check on the others.

Did Fremont remove the Business US 275 signage? I haven't been up there in a minute. I know it was poorly signed (as is everything in Fremont...) but thought there were still signs.

Well, this sent me down a rabbit hole, and I don't have an answer as a result. According to some state maps, this is actually and bizarrely correct. https://dot.nebraska.gov/media/v5mlid3d/cfuncdundysfc.pdf Dundy County GIS uses OSM, so that wasn't much help, and NGPC maps don't show this at all.

My inclination would be to extend Haiger Canal to the Arikaree River, as there are definitely parts that appear to be manmade (namely that really straight stretch), but I don't really have a way of confirming that.

Why did you eliminate service=driveway?

This did not open until today. Please do not rely on aerial imagery to remove construction as that may be severely outdated. Also, OSM has a policy against using imagery without a license.

It is not. Fixed. Thanks for catching; not sure how this slipped past me!

Can you be more specific as to where the concern is? This is a four year old edit and my memory isn't that good! I don't disagree with your statement in general, but I also can't verify this situation without knowing where you are referring to.

Not surprised; Haymarket is a bit of a mess and I just need to go through and clean up a bunch of things. I'll take a crack at it sometime this week.

Whoops; thanks!

As much as I appreciate the Cornhusker Council history as an avid Scouter in the area, this is not how to edit this. This is not the name of the woodland, and historic names have a different tagging scheme.

I recommend checking out OpenHistoricMaps for stuff like this.

I appreciate the adding of the bike path. Everything I've encountered about it has indicated that it is officially an extension of Hollow Road; is there signage stating "South Bypass"? And should it be upgraded from tertiary? This was originally mapped as primary.

Should be fixed now. Thanks!

The proper way to tag business route is to write out "Business", not abbreviate to "Bus", as shown on osm.wiki/United_States_roads_tagging#U.S._Highways. Please revert.

Yep, read that on the wiki and then used destination out of habit. Thanks for catching that! I'll fix it now.

Why did you mark several roads as no access?