I think you may have misunderstood how the access=no tag works. It is overriding access on US 77 entirely, despite motor_vehicles=yes.

Is this bypass open already? I was under the impression that it hasn't opened yet, but I could be wrong.

If it is, looks like there's a bit of cleanup to do with road priorities and ref tags on the old highway.

I'm using iD. There was no trunk route to the ramps previously, just a trunk_link. 4th Corso is now a trunk. I'm going to go ahead and clean this up.

Could you explain this edit, please? You seem to have added some trunk spurs, which does not mesh with OSM standards, and why was the link dropped?

I'm not entirely sure what you did here or what your goal was, but ya done gone broke things. (It happens.)

Could you explain what you did so that we can try to fix it? Looks like you broke a few relations of multipolygons.

Thanks!

Also check expressway tags.

I'm not sure why this was included in your edits of Highway 12, but your edits on US 34/75 need some quality control. Some directions go the wrong way. Is this even open yet?

I am inclined for intermittent over deleting outright, and maybe changing the tag from lake to something more appropriate to its depth even when full. It does appear on state and federal maps, so it at least exists sometimes, and some of the aerial maps do appear soggy at least. This area also dramatically changes by season and drought (I see the unmapped canal is also dry in these images). I tried to see if there was any local street view photography, but no such luck out there (not surprised).

Fixed; thanks!

Fixed; thanks! (That's what I get for trying to separate lines and add more detail...)

Sorry for the delay in response; been busy. Looking at the available options, I am more inclined now for including the name and the tag name:signed=no. I guess if the renderer doesn't pick up on that tag, it's their problem.

Meanwhile, in the unlikely event that I find myself with free time, I'll see if I can poke someone at the county sign shop about fixing this. I still find it weird that this is the only highway in the county that doesn't get signed.

So it appears there is a bit of a mixed message on the wiki between what you suggested and what I did (name= page explicitly says what is on the street sign). I think either way works; the data is there at least, so navigation software can use it. I'm inclined toward my method (which was unsigned_NAME, not unsigned_ref; I mistyped above) a bit more solely because I don't want to mislead someone into looking for a N 56th St sign (or N 56Th St, as Lancaster County is fond of doing...) that doesn't exist.

Every time I drive it (and most recently was last Sunday), I check to see if the county has put up signs. Still nothing. I'm quite surprised because Lancaster County is usually pretty good about posting some sort of signage (even if they have some weird habits). Maybe the Google Data Center being built will give them a good kick in the pants to get moving? (Although that will probably become Lincoln's problem.)

So, funny story: it ISN'T ever signed as N 56th St north of the interstate. (I didn't believe it either at first.) There is no intersection signage anywhere north of the interstate; all crossroads are signed in the median and thus do not show N 56th St. This is made even stranger because S 12th St signs DO exist frequently along the old Cornhusker Hwy (US 77 south of Lincoln) and Rokeby Rd signs along the Werner Expwy (N 2). Matter of fact, one of the direction signs for N 56th St as one exits the interstate specifically points only south of the interstate. And OSM policy is that it must be signed. I went ahead and changed it to unsigned_ref, as I do think a few maps do call it that (not the first time GIS was wrong!).

Fix abbreviations

Fix abbreviations

Fix abbreviations

Fix abbreviations

Fix abbreviations

Fix abbreviations