Pozdravljeni TNP, veseli me da v OSM prispevate tudi vi!

Zanima me, zakaj se vam je zdelo smiselno odstraniti oznaki za
wikidata=Q1163005
in
wikipedia=sl:Triglavski narodni park

Ti dve oznaki sta namreč predstavljali povezavi na:
https://www.wikidata.org/entity/Q1163005?uselang=sl
https://sl.wikipedia.org/wiki/sl:Triglavski%20narodni%20park?uselang=sl

Več o teh oznakah si lahko preberete na:
wikidata=*?uselang=sl
in
wikipedia=*?uselang=sl

There might be similar problem near https://maproulette.org/challenge/39264/task/162489719 where a massive demolition and rebuilding is being done.

Well, it just happens, that in Ljubljana there is a newer version of orthophoto available, published by the city.
That one is also available in JOSM editor, but apparently not used detect missing building tasks for maproulette.

I have marked the task https://maproulette.org/browse/challenges/39264 as not an issue with link to new orthophoto to hopefully prevent such mishaps in future.

Reverted in changeset/137232074

Please note, that most of these buildings were demolished and all orthophotos aren't up to date yet.
See one that is: https://www.arcgis.com/home/webmap/viewer.html?basemapUrl=https%3A%2F%2Fgis06.ljubljana.si%2Farcgis%2Frest%2Fservices%2FPodloge%2FDOF_2022_D96%2FMapServer&source=sd

Added proposed=tertiary (same as Bratislavska cesta and Pot na Fužine) and source
https://www.ljubljana.si/assets/Uploads/Elaborat-lokacijske-preveritve2.pdf

Hej, zakaj poleg obstoječih cest rišeš vzporedne ceste za motorna vozila, npr way/1152865467

It seems this introduced gaps in many bus routes. Please see https://ptna.openstreetmap.de/results/SI/Ljubljana/SI-Ljubljana-LPP-Analysis.diff.html

Ah, sorry for the wrongful accusation on my part. It seems that they were broken before you touched them, fixing them partially as indicating in the changeset comment.

Hey, the admin relations are not closed anymore. Can you please fix that?
Thanks!

Iz višjega dela kristalne palače
way/305523064
sem odstranil building=commercial
ker je to le building:part (glej building:part=* ),
ki je vsebovan v celotni zgradbi way/143867459
ki že ima building=commercial

Merged the table to osm.wiki/Bus_routes_in_Ljubljana
so we don't have id duplicated anymore

Ha, i didn't know about that one :)

yes, it is outdated, we'd need to merge them, maybe into a new "Bus routes in Ljubljana" page

FYI, there is a list of bus LPP bus lines in wiki: osm.wiki/WikiProject_Slovenia/Javni_prevozi
I have updated the wiki with the new relation, but it probably needs more updates...

Did they start building this road yet?

Tnx, will check and remove tomorrow, but don't mind if they are removed earlier.

Hej, a source tag na changesetu se ni v JOSMu samodejno nastavil na "RABA-KGZ"?

Agree, the redacted information (unit name) is published for all to see in several places, some describing the location in detail:

https://www.grosuplje.si/objava/240049
http://www.slovenskavojska.si/struktura/poveljstvo-sil-sv/enota-za-elektronsko-bojevanje-eeb/
http://www.zvvs.si/?stran=novica&id=2126
https://www.mojaobcina.si/grosuplje/novice/slovesnosti-ob-dnevu-eeb-se-je-udelezil-tudi-direktor-obcinske-uprave-mag-dusan-hocevar.html
https://www.facebook.com/429873280405902/posts/v-petek-3-julija-2020-je-v-kamni-gorici-na-obrobju-grosupljega-kjer-ima-svoj-sed/3193438470716022/
https://grosuplje.e-obcina.si/objava/271497
https://www.gov.si/drzavni-organi/organi-v-sestavi/generalstab-slovenske-vojske/o-generalstabu-slovenske-vojske/poveljstvo-sil/enota-za-elektronsko-bojevanje-eeb/

Hey, may I ask why you deleted the node
node/208592566
which was a node representing a country? place=country

Thank you JM82 for the explanation. Tags name:sl and name:hu already existed before and name tag contained both names, combined with a "/", as "on the ground" place signs.

It would not be the first time that validation tools wrongfully complain about some uncommon issue. This is why there are some exceptions in the source code of the check - see https://github.com/osm-fr/osmose-backend/blob/master/plugins/Name_Multiple.py

I have reverted this changeset with changeset/84472451

If you think the name tags are wrong there please let's discuss it on the OSM forum https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?pid=785118#p785118

Thanks for not doing it in other places and please refrain from doing so in the future without discussing it first with local community.

All best!