Is relation/6191974 replacing relation/357283 ? Looking at the two now, there seems to be some issues - I'd expect relation/6191974 not to have ways joining across the middle of the park.

Thanks for fixing this. It's also my recollection from when I was last there that 395 here isn't a motorway. For info, the mapper who changed it to one has been asked to stop making "dubious edits" in the past (osm.org/user_blocks/892).
If you see more problems please do fix them (for which thanks in advance!) and if you'd like the DWG to get involved drop a mail to data@osmfoundation.org .
Best Regards,
Andy Townsend (SomeoneElse) on behalf of OpenStreetMap's Data Working Group.

I notice that you've made this stretch of the 395 into a motorway (and that another user has since changed it back).

Please don't engage in "fantasy mapping" - it's important to map the world as it exists, not as you'd like it to exist. Certainly the last time I drove that stretch of 395 it couldn't be described as a motorway. It was a few years ago but I can't believe it's all been upgraded (and neither did the mapper who changed it back to trunk).

You were asked back in February (osm.org/user_blocks/892) to not add "guesswork" to OSM. Please don't - you'll be blocked from mapping if you do.
Best Regards,
Andy Townsend (SomeoneElse) on behalf of OpenStreetMap's Data Working Group.

There definitely seem to be some problems here. Have a look at osm.org/edit?editor=potlatch2&node=4164881809#map=19/-42.92845/147.99563 (that'll show duplicate nodes clearer than JOSM will) - number of duplicate nodes show up quite clearly. Please don't try to fix it yet though - it'll need a bit of careful planning re how best to tidy up I think.

Please don't add test data to the live OpenStreetMap Server. If you want a test server, perhaps http://api06.dev.openstreetmap.org/ would work for you?

Hi,
Did you discuss the change of name for Kosovo relation/2088990 with anyone living there? (I'm guessing from your recent edits that you're from Macedonia). The use of multiple languages in one name (especially separated by a comma) isn't widely accepted in OSM, though some OSM communities have agreed on that format among themselves.
Best Regards,
Andy Townsend (SomeoneElse) on behalf of OpenStreetMap's Data Working Group

While " Fixing major highways that overlap with minor highways" does explain what you were changing it doesn't say where, or what the source was, and this changeset is huge!

Rather than just using a changeset comment of "tagging" here it would be much more useful if you actually described the change that you made :)

While "Fixing minor highways that contains impossible angles" does explain what you were changing it doesn't say where, and this changeset is huge!

Ah - OK, thanks.

What does "write error correction" mean?

Are way/402995159 and way/402995178 really spelt with a double S? The village, and other amenities, aren't. Also, you didn't happen to notice what the access to way/402995582/history from the west is? It seems to be a closed gate at the east.

Please don't talk this way about other mappers, even in comments on your own changesets. You've been warned about this before and if you continue you'll be prevented from editing OpenStreetMap.
Best Regards,
Andy Townsend (SomeoneElse) on behalf of OpenStreetMap's Data Working Group.

Hi,
Not entirely sure why you've removed the address information from way/413708335/history here?
Cheers,
Andy

Something went wrong here - a building got added at latidude 0, longitude 0. I deleted it.

I'm guessing that the "shop=mobile_phone" on some of the money agents might not be one of shop=mobile phone either - maybe it's a person who uses his mobile phone to move money around, or someone who also sells phonecards / topups (but not phone hardware)?

Hi,
Just wondered - what does the "KG" in "KG Ground Survey" stand for? Just curious (other people have asked me)...
Cheers,
Andy

For info, the relevant iD enhancement request is https://github.com/openstreetmap/iD/issues/974 . It appears that the reason why it wasn't supported almost from day 1 was that the schema is too complicated :)
(FWIW I'm also guilty of typing the opening hours in in English and letting someone who cares about the wiki syntax come and correct it later - sorry about that)

This changeset contains nodes at latitude 0, longitude 0. Please fix this buggy import.

This changeset contains nodes at latitude 0, longitude 0. Please fix this buggy import.