SomeoneElse's Comments
| Changeset | When | Comment |
|---|---|---|
| 34094400 | Hi,
|
|
| 30165853 | For anyone who's not aware, http://api06.dev.openstreetmap.org/ is a copy of the OSM site with only test data in it that can be used e.g. for testing things out in the editor. No-one that I'm aware of renders tiles from it, but you could if you wanted to. |
|
| 33297010 | Dunham bridge was already mapped; I've removed the duplicate node/3693857747 . |
|
| 33979156 | @Saariselka Kuukkeli from looking at http://osm.mapki.com/history/relation.php?id=3100590 , I don't think that that apartment becoming part of the relation happened in this changeset. I've removed it, removed it from the nordic ski route too, and added the building tag back to the sauna too. |
|
| 33372693 | Hello! I think that something has gone a bit wrong with some of these new ways. Some of them, for example way/366002500 , have no tags on them, so whatever they are they'll never appear on any map. You'll need to select them in the editor again and choose what feature they are.
|
|
| 33979156 | @Saariselka Kuukkeli could you link to where please? |
|
| 33506329 | Although you've changed way/322964225 back you clearly haven't checked everything - way/322964224 and way/322964223 are similar. Also way/97953082 from the imagery looks more like a hedge; I'd suggest contacting the previous mapper or adding a note. One of the Malaysian ones (previously source=bing) looks more like woodland than either scrub or bushes. Again, a note would be better. |
|
| 33985933 | Hi, is there any reason why you've changed "Old Coach Road" to "OLD COACH ROAD" on e.g. way/369365280/history ? The usual suggestion is to use mixed case (see osm.wiki/Names for details).
|
|
| 28048528 | It's a while since I've been to Egham but while Englefield Green is definitely signposted from there I've never seen signs to "New Egham".
|
|
| 34027822 | Hello and welcome to OpenStreetMap!
|
|
| 33840802 | Hello and welcome to OpenStreetMap! Just noticed you've mapped what looks like a gliding club clubhouse as a military airfield. That's more usually used for things like RAF bases such as way/219355109 For clubhouse buildings, building=clubhouse is used a bit (see e.g. way/289370686 ). Cheers, Andy |
|
| 33939546 | Hello and welcome to OpenStreetMap! If way/256741828/history is just a dwelling now there's no need to add "amenity=place_of_worship". If it's an obvious church building it might make sense to use "building=church" though. Hope you don't mind me mentioning this - just trying to help.
|
|
| 33488779 | Hi - just spotted way/366850501 here (a way without tags). |
|
| 33826128 | For info (re the Bulwell example) node/3294148133 might serve as a prototype for mapping individual bits of kit within a leisure=pitch area (see also way/322575618 ) |
|
| 25384026 | I'd imagine that (after checking that they still have the same content and adjusting if necessary) it should be possible to fix by just deleting the duplicates. The relevant wiki page osm.wiki/WikiProject_United_Kingdom_National_Cycle_Network/National_Routes refers to relation relation/12763 , so it might make sense to keep that one. |
|
| 33669341 | Hello and welcome to OpenStreetMap! You may have noticed that this path isn't showing on any maps. That's because you've not said what sort of feature it is. In the editor click on it, type "footpath" into the big search box, and select "foot path" (the top entry) then save. |
|
| 33546485 | Is the ticket shop here way/367253732 really still in operation? I'm not familiar with the area, but https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Birnbeck_Pier says "The pier remains in a largely derelict state.". |
|
| 33297042 | Grassthorpe Lane Crossing was already surveyed and mapped; I've deleted your duplicate one in changeset/34000902 . |
|
| 33976849 | For info I've reverted this and a number of other historical / fantasy changes in changeset/33982218 and subsequent changesets. |
|
| 33826128 | Actually, I'm not convinced about fitness_centre _or_ pitch for these - someone (I think that it was SK53, who has actually edited this object previously) did dig out a more appropriate tag. The tagging list will, I'm sure, have lots of suggestions. |