Hello AzerAkhundov,
Can you explain the name change here? A natural=peak in a historically Armenian-speaking area had its name changed from an Armenian name to "2599"? This seems at best unlikely.
Best Regards,
Andy Townsend, on behalf of OSM's Data Working Group.

Merhaba Orkhan17,
Bunu tek seferde küçük bir parça halinde düzenlemek yerine lütfen https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/edit-warring-over-nagorno-karabakh-region-republic/57413/14 adresindeki tartışmaya katılabilir misiniz?
Saygılarımla,
Andy Townsend, OSM Veri Çalışma Grubu adına.

Hello Orkhan17,
Rather than editing this a small piece at a time can you please join the discussion at https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/edit-warring-over-nagorno-karabakh-region-republic/57413/14 ?
Best Regards,
Andy Townsend, on behalf of OSM's Data Working Group.

Thanks for filling in the gap here. There are quite a few more that you can see at http://ra.osmsurround.org/analyzeMap?relationId=85775 . I'm guessing that they predate your editing of it; I'm just mention it here because I bet you can fill in some of the other gaps!

For waymarks see image links from node/11216196019 and node/11216175282

I've removed the fixme from relation/3318993 the Harcamlow Way that had said "no waymarks" since there _are_ now waymarks for at least part of this.

Thanks!

@GPSMAP67 You have now promised again (by OSM PM) not to edit way/1086252957. You did this previously on 30/05/2023 and then broken that promise just now.
To be clear, all that anyone is asking for is some evidence that this is, in OSM terms, a "path". Next time you're there, take a photo or three so that we can discuss with everyone else what the best tagging for it is.

Again, I'd suggest to both sides of this argument that a discussion at https://community.openstreetmap.org (with photos attached!) would be far more productive than tit for tat complaints to the DWG.

Also ts0196a and ts0197b, Beningbrough

Re "Apparently someone did the ground work and has visited the site" they clearly didn't notice that the POI was in the middle of the road :)
I'll delete it.

Hello Rockedf,
For the avoidance of doubt, OSM is NOT a business directory. Most "work from home" businesses will not be and should not be in OSM. The adder of this "business" was asked about it in changeset/137416757 and didn't reply; that's often a good indication that it's not a real bricks-and-mortar business.
Best Regards,
Andy

That sounds very much like an organised editing process. Can you please read https://wiki.osmfoundation.org/wiki/Organised_Editing_Guidelines and make sure that you follow it?

Clearly the POI here is rubbish. The location is in the middle of the road!

It's clear that the business owner accepts bitcoin, at least according to her website https://w4lkies.com/ .

What is NOT clear is whether this is actual a physical business that is mappable in OSM at all.
OSM is not a business directory - work from home businesses wouldn't typically be added.

Have you actually visited this location and verified that there is a physical business location here?

Re "how come you keep blindly demanding explanations in my change sets" then the reason is because the DWG is getting continual complaints. I'm not in Luxemburg and can't judge how much merit they have or not; that's way it'd be great to have photo evidence of some of these (and thanks for providing that in the past).

Thanks!

Hallo,
Wat was de aanleiding voor de opmaak van het veld "naam" van Marokko hier?
Hartelijke groeten,
Andy

Hello,
What prompted the formatting of the "name" field of Morocco here?
Best Regards,
Andy

Re "someone should do a thorough review" you might want to mention it at community.osm.org or in OSM US' Slack so that more people are aware of it.
Best Regards,
Andy

I've hidden the spam link.