Hello Matthew Hinton,

I have undone the changes you made to US 43. There has been recent discussion of highway classification in the United States, and we reached a consensus in the state of Alabama. If you would like to read about our decision, you should take a look at osm.wiki/User:SherbetS/Draft:Alabama_Highways.

Hello NikkiAnderson,

when you add a square building, you can press Q in the editor to automatically square the building.

poggers

marvyn, not cotswold

what software do you use when your ride your bike?

I manually reviewed every object that was changed to make sure that I did not incorrectly modify anything. I want to know what makes a changeset too big. In my opinion, this changeset is of a fair size, since I only edited objects in france and that is what the changeset spans. Is there a wiki page or local consensus of when a changeset becomes a problematic size?

okay.

in my interpretation, a tower is a structure with places to stand, while a communications tower is a tower that is greater than 100 meters tall. I downloaded all the objects with man_made=communications_tower and changed any that I found didn’t meet this specification.

can you point to any particular towers that were incorrectly tagged? I tried my best to match the data to the information on the wiki.

What’s with the note about google maps?

Hello,

I recommend using man_made=mast instead of man_made=communications tower given the description on the wiki for structures like the ones you tagged.

Hello,

The tag man_made=communications_tower is for very large structures, man_made=mast is more fitting for these structures.

Hello,
I am writing on this changeset to ask why you have removed all the tiger:reviewed tags on the roads in Smith County, Mississippi, even on roads that may not be valid and were otherwise unedited. Automated edits are discouraged, and this one seems to fall under that category.

Hello,

I've noticed that you used the tag man_made=communications_tower
to tag this freestanding mast. JOSM makes this preset confusing, but the correct scheme is to use man_made=mast in combination with tower:type=communication to tag these structures.

Hello,

I've noticed that you used the tag man_made=communications_tower
to tag this lattice mast. JOSM makes this preset confusing, but the correct scheme is to use man_made=mast in combination with tower:type=communication to tag these structures.

Hello,

I've noticed that you used the tag man_made=communications_tower
to tag this lattice mast. JOSM makes this preset confusing, but the correct scheme is to use man_made=mast in combination with tower:type=communication to tag these structures.

Hello,
I work to discourage the use of the man_made=communications tower incorrectly. JOSM can be tricky about recommending this feature, but the correct tagging scheme is man_made=mast + tower_type=communication.

Thank you

Nice catch, I double checked on the Mapillary imagery.

Hello,
Please use the tag man_made=mast + tower:type=communication for communication masts next time.