Thanks!

I've updated it even further, by Esri imagery. It is never in this area than Bing.

Hi! Are you sure that historic=monument is accurate description of way/1104506426 ? Seems more like tourism=artwork to me

Hi!

I am going to delete this node. It seems to be a mistake.

It is located within already existing relation/11191111 "Parque Vale do Leça"

Hi! I checked your latest changesets and it seems you always use "Orthophotos of mainland Portugal - 25 cm - 2018 (DGT)" imagery layer when performing your edits. Have you seen, that there is layer switcher in iD editor? And "Bing Maps Aerial" higher resolution and just about 2 years old - much more recent than "Orthophotos of mainland Portugal". I recommend you try it out. Mapping with such clear imagery is much more fun! And allows making more precise edits.

Hello!

It seems to me you have used "name" tags incorrectly in this change. This cemetery does not actually has a name.

See osm.wiki/Good_practice#Don't_use_name_tag_to_describe_things (section "Don't use name tag to describe things") and osm.wiki/Names#Name_is_the_name_only (section "Name is the name only").

I am going to remove name here

heritage:website link is broken now( Maybe you know current working link?

Hi

I am going to move specie name to species=* tag . I think "name" should not be used for it.

Hi! Are you sure that way/1391567003 is a parking area? Do you have other sources besides bing aerial imagery? Does not look like car parking space to me on bing imagery.

Hello!

This changeset is problematic. It several buildings on top of existing ones. For instance, way/1305386992 is located in the same place where building relation/8889531 already present.

Another one way/1305387001 even should not be a building! There is water body there way/640937775

It seems that this changeset was produced by some kind of automation. Please do not upload other changes from the same tool without manual verification.