The code is the change set number as seen in the CS summary.
There's one in Italy who's comment is only a name acronym and a sequence number, but never telling what he does, another who's always commenting to be adding buildings when most don't. Asked for meaningful comment, no response.

Comments help to determine if they can just be ignored or actually have a subject of interest. No comment or codes invokes suspicion.

The consequence of this action is that addresses that had the full street name are now being flagged in QA with "No street with name "Via Camillo Benso conte di Cavour" found around". That's quite a few.
Also, now short_name and name are the same and the long name was not moved to full_name.

As someone wrote in an argument "mapping should be fun".

And so we learned that if an object is not fully downloaded as was long 1 line Via Nazionale and start cutting it up and rename a section you get a validator warning that the object is incomplete when saving. If then downloading the object in full one ends up with 2 ways on top of each other, nodes merged and all and no validator warning when saving the edit. Presto pronto, a 35 node duplicate edge created. 👎 This would not have been possible in ID Editor unless hitting the ignore button. Me don't.

Hi,

I've been struggling with ZTL zone tagging versus what OSM Inspector is flagging as having an Island Car issue in Ortona. Studying the Modena ZTL zone, Via Caselle, way/23196324 is the only one that is signalled as having the very issue in ZTL, the difference being that everything around is tagged as motor_vehicle=private and this street is motor_vehicle=yes. which highlights basically that all the area is allowed at some time of day/week for cars, but Caselle has no restriction. Given it's inside the ZTL zone it than gets turned into a car island, no in or out. The solution for Caselle is obvious... align with tagging of surrounding streets but given my poor comprehension of the subject, leaving the correction to you 😎

ciao from the Abruzzi.

link: https://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=routing&lon=10.92515&lat=44.64241&zoom=19&baselayer=Geofabrik%20Standard&opacity=0.45&overlays=islands_car%2Cislands_all

Ciao
Secondo la serie di numeri civici crescenti all'angolo con Via Monte Maiella e l'indirizzo del ristorante https://it-it.facebook.com/lagallina.camminante/ al nr 24, il nome della via è Via Ciampoli . Vi prego di fornire una prova del nuovo nome. "Via Vico degli Aranci" di quel tratto di strada.
grz

Great, to paraphrase what they say in shops, "you break it, you bought it", in OSM it's "you change it, you own & fix it" albeit, going by the number of ignores the neis report logs for ID users e.g. https://hdyc.neis-one.org/?dp7 , sadly the reality is quite different. /o\

BG

Hi,

You path crosses water twice (warnings:crossing_ways:highway-waterway: 2). You need to qualify what those crossings area.... bridge, ford, culvert in stream

ciao?

Hi

Still a veritable mess, seeing a miles long bridge on top of a miles long path which is mapped largely on top of a miles long path, the eldest, that ratrun mapped 3 years ago. Are you ready to use the reverter as moving a few nodes wont do it, Still flagged in OSMI.

Ciao

Hi,

Welcome to OSM.

This is not the shape of the building,, that was the construction area. You need to map the buildings separately, which look like 2 attached apartment buildings, 4-5 floors with a connect in between, probably needing the condo=yes tag in addition.

ciao.

Hi ancora.

Aspettando la tua risposta. Nel frattempo ha cambiato Piantando 1 in una zona di confine in quanto contiene un mix di frutteti, vigneti, erba e bosco. Il sito web non spiega l'area più ampia che è anche un mix di bosco, macchia e agricoltura.
Mappa ciò che effettivamente sul terreno, non ciò che ti piace che sia.
Pensa che debba anche essere rietichettato in una zona di confine.

SekeRob

Render of the 325, now 327 member farmland has successfully restored. If the causing section suggests, the missing outline piece was last edited 5 years ago and view at 2km zoom and lower wtih no farmland showing confirms it's been longer broken. Je ne comprends pas pourquoi il a été cassé aussi longtemps.

Hi,

The area you mapped covers same areas as existing forest and the outlines cross themselves which cannot be. What's the plan with this 'project'?

L'area che hai mappato copre le stesse aree della foresta esistente e i contorni si incrociano, cosa che non può essere. Qual è il piano con questo? Questo progetto ha un nome?

SekeRob

E? Edifice non e inner per niente, Amico. ;o)

Ce ne sono già stati parecchi sulla costa, amico ;O),. Non ha urgenza. Vecchia espressione inglese DIRFT: Do it right first time every time (Fallo bene la prima volta ogni volta.)

We (me at least) also witnesses that your JOSM version is 18463 where the latest stable tested is 18570. 😎

PS, it's curious that at least 4 of your springs are corners of the same building, so was it springs you did or something else too ;P).

OR, as JOSM allows, upload each object separately: Upload screen > Settings tab > "Upload each object individually" radio button,

Di niente

Almost Too Simple.

Hi,

V.v. your resolution of duplicate segments, you ignored entirely that a Trabocco consist of a building in the sea on poles aka it's on layer=1, a walking bridge from shore to building and planks on poles (the arms you see reaching out into the see from which the fishing nets are hung out). In short, not a building of multiple parts.

Now the DS errors on OSMI has disappeared and everyone forgets the mapping is entirely wrong.

Ciao,

vv la tua risoluzione di segmenti duplicati, hai ignorato del tutto che un Trabocco consiste in un edificio nel mare su pali alias è su layer=1, un ponte pedonale dalla riva all'edificio e assi su pali (le braccia che vedi protendersi nel mare da cui si appendono le reti da pesca). Insomma, non un edificio di più parti.

Ora l'avvisi DS su OSMI è scomparso e tutti dimenticano che la mappatura è completamente sbagliata. Rosoluzione niente.

Imagine: https://www.google.com/search?q=trabocco

Gone ahead and reported the issue of valid tag removals and leaving the white lines only to the Data Work Group "mapping for rendering", to include incorrect tag usages such as footways as areas. Unacceptable to me.

cheers

Hi,

Your H2 updated path always ended at a cliff reaching the top, but now it's mapped too in OSM. Must be an pretty impressive sight from there going by 3D imagery, on a clear day of course. A viewpoint node would certainly not be out of place I think in that spot, worth the hiking travails getting there.

ciao

Hi,

Case you read this, Bea has been reversing the path tags again so the island car and island all have started to reappear again in my OSMI list for the stuff I fixed. Even the paths I added few days ago from paths to entrances have changed to tagless lines again. Clearly rules seem not to apply here, laughing stock if you ask me.

ciao from Italy who was foolish enough to correct a typo in wheelchair in level0 editor not aware of the stat here, which is when the issues started to appear in my Inspector list, of certain dung type. I leave them now and be patient to see if the DWG finally steps in. To me this is reportable.