Welcome. When you are providing comments on edits, please be more precise and not just say 'added stuff' but however you could for example say 'added buildings' and it is also recommended that you just do one country/area and not a few edits in Australia and a few in New Zealand. Once again, welcome to the OSM community.

Reverted Changset #120416060 as majority of railways with 'oneway=yes' allow 2 way travel of trains. Reverted changeset is #120464415

What do you mean by "stuff all around the globe?" What sort of stuff did you change, etc?

Multiple railway sections you have tagged as "oneway=yes" should not be tagged this way. Trains can travel in both directions on many sections of the track. I have seen the map personally if they can travel in both directions but unable to find any copy of it anywhere on the internet.

Multiple railway sections you have tagged as "oneway=yes" should not be tagged this way. Trains can travel in both directions on many sections of the track. I have seen the map personally if they can travel in both directions but unable to find any copy of it anywhere on the internet.

Multiple railway sections you have tagged as "oneway=yes" should not be tagged this way. Trains can travel in both directions on many sections of the track. I have seen the map personally if they can travel in both directions but unable to find any copy of it anywhere on the internet.

I have fixed it. Made a mistake when editing the area. Edit in: changeset/120412574

The edit was to remove an already incomplete u-turn relation that didn't do anything in terms of routing. If you are wanting to fix the restriction, just add it back in to reinstate the restriction

Do you have any intentions on adding on the 667 route Sunday service to Burpengary? It is shown as a route on the Translink website and Translink documents.

Regarding the platform, I made it as a relation to simplify the amount of areas/ways in the area. It's just to help with the amount of data that is in the area already. I am aware of the roles of the relation and will fix that.

What sort of updates did you do may I ask?

How do you know if the roads are open yet? Was a survey conducted or was other sources used?

Do you have any intentions on adding on the 667 route Sunday service to Burpengary?

Also made changes to bus route 652

Removed Jaycar store in Caboolture as it is non existent and none at the location on the Jaycar website

U-turns are not allowed here as there is a solid white line down middle of road

By the looks from satellite, I would say it's a living_street

Yes, it's just a little awkward with a tertiary road with a max speed of 10 km/h and residential roads all around the road.

The "Oracle Boulevard" should not be tagged as a Tertiary road: way/216566993.
Is there a reason tagging it as Tertiary?

Hi, when tagging powerlines in suburban streets, use the "power=minor_line" tag instead of "power=line"