This is an undiscussed mechanical edit, isn't it?

There are several issues here:
Name with two languages: way/68527205/
Name with two languages: way/326142235
name:ar / name mismatch: node/332638697
Typing error: node/1803067264
.
If you think a place has two names, use name and alt_name. name should equal name:ar.
.
As for the typo, I think you meant حسين

You probably mean this: changeset/53879316
.
Looks good!

Please avoid making further similar edits before explaining what you are trying to do. Otherwise I will revert your changes.

Fourth edit reverted here: changeset/54000668

Reverted. Please discuss here: changeset/53514922

Reverted. Please discuss here: changeset/53514922

Reverted. Please discuss here: changeset/53514922

Please do not add tests to the public map

Also note most of my comments are a month old, many were fixed already...

Let's look at way/415288268. highway=path means people, bicycles, and horses are allowed. foot=no overrides people. So, the final result is that only bicycles and horses are allowed. Is this intentional?

Please note that ways affected by this changeset are listed just below this discussion. You can click them to see the latest version, or you can copy the way id to https://aleung.github.io/osm-visual-history/ in order to see its history. As you can see (e.g. here: https://aleung.github.io/osm-visual-history/#/way/415666260), you have added highway=cycleway, bicycle=no, which are contradicting tags, in October 24, and I reverted that in October 25.

As with other changeset comments, I was probably talking about access=no combines with foot=yes. It seems I've fixed this one since then.

Please see: access=no. "The access=no tag indicates that the road is not to be used by the general public"

access=no - No one is allowed.
bicycle=yes - bicycles are allowed
foot =yes - people are allowed.
.
Suggested tagging:
bridge=yes, highway=path

...Or, if an osm link is better, see this way: way/538975712
.
Since it seems you intended to mark it as "for pedestrians and bicycles", I changed it to highway=path, rather than the previous multi-permission tags. Can you confirm this is OK?

Just to be clear: It appears you often use access=no, foot=yes, highway=path. These are confusing because access=no contradicts foot=yes. Although the Wiki may have some rules for such tagging, it is much simpler to use highway=footway.

way/538975196

Sorry. Last comment got mangled. Repeat: If an OSM link is more convenient: https://www.openstreetmap.org-/way/538975196

If an OSM link is more convenient: If an OSM link is more conve