OpenStreetMap logo OpenStreetMap

Changeset When Comment
50181414

If you are curious regarding territories, I made a list here:

osm.wiki/WikiProject_Israel#Palestine_Related

But that's just about it, there really is no need to mark individual points as as IL or PL. It's just a door for edit wars.

Thanks for your understanding.

50181414

I don't care about politics.

If you look at my edit history, you'll see I make edits both ways. In fact I'm the one who renamed the second "Judea and Samaria" relation (an Israeli name) to "West Bank" (A Palestinian name) because it was objectively the right thing to do.

https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=58606

50181414

I removed "palestenian" from the name tag. Politics have no place in OSM, and the territories are marked by the various relations already.

50172437

Reverted in changeset/50206074

50172437

note > node*

50172437

This note is real. Do not delete nodes just because they don't appear elsewhere. OSM quite often has better data.

Source 1: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kuwaykat

Source 2: http://www.geonames.org/search.html?q=Kuweik%C4%81t&country=

49922346

(somewhat) fixed in changeset/50205789

49922346

It is generally not accepted to tag something with name only, for example, you should also add shop=mall to קניון רפאלי

48028336

This should have been part of a relation. Thanks. Fixed: changeset/50132316

50057292

Link correction: Re Added some, see: changeset/50125821

50063994

Link correction: Re Added some, see: changeset/50125821

50057292

Re-added some. See: changeset/50057292

50063994

Re added some. See changeset/50057292

50125821

Original changeset: changeset/50057292

Revert changeset:changeset/50063994

50125821

User Samir originally uploaded a low-quality changeset (everything tagged as Cafe, many duplicates of places already existing, personal markers, and tagging "north of X, west of X, etc" rather than tagging X itself).

I originally reverted the changeset, but decided to re-add it, because some of the markers are actually useful (although poorly mapped and need double-checking).

In this change-set, I re-added some of the markers, that doesn't mean all are good. Double checking is appreciated. Also, I marked everything as amenity=yes rather than cafe.

50057292

Some of the nodes in this particular changeset have value. If you're reading this, consider re-adding them and tagging them properly, not as cafes.

Also, rather than tagging "north of X", "west of X", etc, you should tag the point where X is at. Thanks.

50106544

Reverted in changeset/50124696

50084243

Reverted all your changes up until #50084243. changeset/50086846#map=12/31.3003/34.3034

50084243

You are spamming the map. I'm afraid I'll need to contact the DWG and suspend you.

50057292

Changes reverted in changeset/50063994