SK53's Comments
| Changeset | When | Comment |
|---|---|---|
| 104893326 | Also worth noting that Andy Townsend's UK specific map handles these cases directly in code (i.e., generates a name containing both parts), see https://map.atownsend.org.uk/maps/map/map.html#zoom=19&lat=51.53159&lon=-0.180258. This really shows that the renderer on the main OSM site is just not using such data. |
|
| 103997958 | Hi Rob, You may have heard from Russ already, but he has double checked that WPD are OK with attribution on the wiki page. So I think we can go at this data in earnest. I have been hunting for the odd STOR whilst adding solar, ever since I saw the one near Ruabon from a coach & wondered what the hell it was. Availability of substations was one of the things Jack wanted for nowcasting too. I'd been wondering if we could find candidates just by looking at unusual parcels in the LR INSPIRE data. Jerry |
|
| 103997958 | Hi Rob, Have created a wiki page for the ref:GB:mpan key ref:GB:mpan=*. You may be able to add more to it. Jerry |
|
| 104081250 | Hi & Welcome to OSM, Thanks for this addition. I'm not sure why anyone would think there was a way through here, there is no path marked & AFAIK the area behind Mr Man's is private land. Only marked paths on OSM can be treated as viable routes for pedestrians, and even then access should be checked. However, you've distorted the building to close the gap. I've therefore removed your edit & added an actual wall, which will show up as a thin black line. If there's a specific reason for this edit, such as people making unwarrranted assumptions about where they can go, do let me know. It is often possible to add more relevant details to help in such cases. Regards, Jerry aka SK53 |
|
| 93063963 | I dont know about some of these grass areas. Substantial parts of the area around Marefield are ploughed crops. (Surveyed in June 2015 & again 2018) |
|
| 97649757 | @malcolmgc: you're ahead of many of us them. I distinguish between desire lines & informal paths (although I think all desire lines are informal paths). A desire line is from A to B for a particular purpose: the following is a very obvious desire line from the gate to the scout hut (https://www.mapillary.com/map/im/tsenzuJQ5lRNE5yLww9fM8). Typical desire lines are from one gate to another of a park, little cut-throughs out of retail car parks to avoid walking the long way round. Informal paths in general are created by people doing things. A lot more have arisen in places around me during the Covid lockdowns: this one is close to the scout hut path, but is used to enable bigger loops https://www.mapillary.com/app/?lat=52.95125816993464&lng=-1.1819407599981135&z=17&focus=photo&pKey=T1mKW9AWIsElvnA9SW9Fx3 (I havent added it to OSM as a) the path line is indistinct; & b) I dont want everyone using it). Desire line paths which are heavily used may end up as proper dedicated paths. This example (way/34330968) was a desire line for students to reach the library & the grass never recovered. After about 25 years the university gave in & put in a paved path. I believe a university in the US didnt have any paths when they opened a new campus, but just waited to see where people walked and paved the heaviest desire lines. The tag(s) are probably most useful in urban areas where the distinctions tend to be clearer. |
|
| 97649757 | Hi Malcolm, I think your conclusion is sensible. There is no real difference between highway=footway and highway=path in the UK other than for the latter it is essential to include information about which transport modes can use it. In other countries (notably Germany) highway=cycleway means a cycle track only accessible to cyclists and therefore share-use facilities tend to be mapped as paths. I think some have used path in rural areas and footway in urban ones. A final one is using path when it is not known what access permissions might be. Therefore, in general, it is better to use one of the more explicit highway tags and perhaps focus on adding surface to help differentiate town & country style paths. The footway=sidewalk & footway=crossing are useful subtags. Jerry aka SK53 |
|
| 97981104 | I've already corrected it: I was an intern there in the past. Also corrected the landuse which someone else had changed to military, probably because IGN & others have blurred it out. |
|
| 97981104 | Why do you think the Reactor Hall of ILL is a storage tank? It is a containment building for a nuclear reactor. |
|
| 66433766 | Hi Marc Marc, I'm not sure the tag existed when I did this. Golf clubs in UK can be a bit complicated as some function as private members bars (amenity=social_club), but I think in this case clubhouse is appropriate, as I think the latter case is mainly true in Scotland. But if the club house is genuinely private (i.e., you need an invitation) then amenity doesn't seem quite right. The social club style of pub is common in the UK, Ireland, Australia and possibly Canada. They require membership, but usually this can be acquired very easily, or someone will sign you in as a guest. They are much closer to pubs & bars than ordinary clubs. Jerry |
|
| 34443555 | Abney Park may have been an arboretum around 200 years ago, but certainly not now. Since the cemetery company ran out of cash (1970s IIRC) the place became quite wild with trees self-seeding and growing anywhere. It's full of strange things, which are growing wild: Service Tree of Fontainebleau, Various-leaved Hawthorn. Most photos don't do it justice, as when trees are in leaf the canopy cover makes it too dark for decent photos! In many places the graves are completely obscured by vegetation and so it can be treacherous underfoot. It's rightly now a wild place, even if the mix of trees is somewhat eclectic. There are also plenty of native herbs which have colonised. Also there is very little grass, just odd patches near the two gates and along the S boundary. Jerry |
|
| 102626378 | Hi, Search for some of these terms on the wiki: * for road width: width or minwidth for the narrowest section. If you make the measurement option available one can now make reasonable measurements on the aerial imagery (or if you feel particularly enthusiastic a tape measure in the field!). In general I'd assume a lanes=1 road was about 4-5 m wide as a default. I believe SomoneElse's rendering shows very narrow roads (https://map.atownsend.org.uk/maps/map/map.html#zoom=15&lat=54.209&lon=-1.23322) as well as more detail in rural areas
Although as Bernard says absence of road markings may not have a well-established tag, it is something which is repeatably observable & I'd say perfectly reasonable to add to OSM. I think it's an interesting project & probably useful to have one area where someone has approached this systematically. Jerry aka SK53 |
|
| 102659993 | Hi Robert, This edit has alerted me to something I wish I'd been at aware of before in that NSI splits the other Tesco formats/concepts as distinct brands. This was certainly not my original intent when I created the UK retail chains page. The idea was to use a single brand across all properties of the major supermarkets as they created distinct formats. Perhaps not so important for Tesco but certainly for M&S and Co-ops. I think Geolytix also made a distinction between brand and format in their open retail data. It's certainly how the industry used to talk when I worked in it (although the precise term for "format" may have varied a bit). Certainly this makes things more consistent, but a bit less useful. Sorry, for potentially crying over spilt milk. Jerry |
|
| 79530724 | Hi, I dont believe what you have added is a primary link. It really does not reflect what is on the ground. The main road goes from 2 to 3 lanes & the LH lane is a turning lane on to St Peter's St, not a distinct carriageway. It is also controlled by the same set of lights as the main road & you failed to adjust the geometry of the cycle route to interconnect. Thanks, |
|
| 86742996 | Are you sure Ropewalk House has 4 levels? I counted 5 today (3 regular ones & 2 basements). |
|
| 102495712 | Thanks for updating this. Jerry |
|
| 100530676 | Hi Jay, I had wondered why you had made such a specific edit away from your usual haunts. Good luck. As I walk past twice a day I definitely know that furniture has been removed (also by peeking in at the windows). Much of the removal seemed to be done by staff in hired vans rather than by a professional firm, so had assumed it was a local move. I'll have another shufti this morning: there is another firm named on notices on the front door. The building was specifically built for Romax, so I imagine they still hold the lease, but whether they'll re-open here or in Ruddington remains to be seen. Jerry |
|
| 100530676 | Hi Jay, I suspect this might be a bit premature. As far as I know the building is now vacant. Romax have relocated to Ruddington (https://romaxtech.com/events-and-resources/news/romax-move-into-new-uk-headquarters/)
Jerry |
|
| 102012164 | Havent really untangled the two minor power lines heading NNE from substation outside Blaenporth |
|
| 60350126 | When I did the Fora da l'Aua path a long time ago (2003) there was a rope or chain on the upper 'grassy' part before reaching the rocks. Is it still there? (In which case it is not mapped). |