fixed, the rendering seems coming back

fixed

+ tags added

+ tags corrected

Hi! I see you've created a recent MP relation/12152534 but it's outer ring is really big and by experience i know that it will lead to the 2k node limitation after having refined its precision and other adjacent elements. I see you haven't added yet the other the inner areas in the MP so i hope you will split it before other wise i really suggest to do so.

Hello! @Lyon-St-Clair please do not connect highways which are each on different level like this one you did here: node/1570723006
See the result on this routing from main road passing through walls and reaching the underground footway osm.org/directions?engine=graphhopper_foot&route=49.86921%2C6.15816%3B49.86928%2C6.15838#map=19/49.86927/6.15825
I've let it so you can view and learn from your mistake, please correct it after viewing, thanks.

+ corrected direction of "Mur Paien" walls

On ne sait jamais pour l'existence d'une croix en faveur d'une bénédiction, un miracle local, demander protection... où le tag était juste mal choisi au lieu de man_made=cross. Dommage, je trouvais cela romantique. Meilleurs voeux pour cette nouvelle année!

Bonjour! C'est normal ce chemin de croix en plein milieu de la rivière? node/7547713797

Bonjour! Au sujet de ce chemin: way/821621139 C'est assez étrange d'ajouter un sentier aussi long qui n'est pas du tout visible, (trail_visibility = no). Confirmé par vous-même via le tag, toute ressource de photo aérienne disponible et aucune activité GPS Heatmap. Pouvez-vous m'expliquer, s'il vous plaît? Je crains que quelqu'un commence à suivre ce chemin sur la carte et se perde dans un endroit aussi éloigné où le terrain influence beaucoup.

+ new elements mostly for seperating crossings/sidewalks

Sorry pressed keyboard "enter" without having finished my comment...
Have there been changes in the network? Is the cycleway inherently part of the road, the painting on the floor being the only seperation (in this case cycleway=* needs to be added to the road) or is it totally separated by a significant feature like a barrier, etc ( then a dedicated highway=cycleway can be plotted)?

Why are there 2 OSM elements way/333645017 and way/682684477 for the same cycleway feature from here and further to the eastern? This is considered as duplication

It does not work the way you intend. The landuse key hosts the entire features over that ground, therefore other floors than ground-floor included.

+ replacement of BCEE Clock Tower node by actual building

These ways too:
way/554936465
way/295929074
way/809031928
way/809031929

Hi! About this path: way/295929072 can you confirm it is really going over water during all the way you have set (ford=yes), which would mean over 1km large water? On the sat. photos, it does not seem so, obviously there is no continuous 1km large water way. There are rather time to time fords to cross over occasional streams. This is inaccurate compared to reality and therefore misleading when viewing the map only.

You are contributing since 2015 with over 13800 changesets... Normally you should know by now that a tag added on the way means it is all over the length of the feature. For features on a more specific spot, tags are rather put over a node. Please avoid this kind of mistake from now on, it is important. I trust you to correct all mistakes you can remember. Thanks for your comprehension!

was not meant for this changeset...

new elements, tags added, positions enhanced

new elements, tags added, positions enhanced