Hello! This area way/338536615/history was a multi-polygon relation with inner areas. Obviously now smaller since you split the forest in 2 with this one way/667900970/history . Why didn't you integrate both areas accordingly in a MP, both having inners, instead of changing both parts as simple polygons while leaving the relation only with the inner areas??? Please don't break elements and if you need to change them, change correctly. If you are not sure of being able to handle MP, just leave them. I have corrected your mistake. Thanks for your comprehension!

+ new elements

Bonsoir! Veuillez trouver dans le Wiki d'OSM osm.wiki les tags votés et adoptés par la communauté pour représenter correctement les différents éléments sinon vos efforts ne seront pas vraiment mis en contribution et visibles sur la carte. Ici vous avez omis de mettre le tag essentiel pour un point de vue: "tourism=viewpoint). J'ai corrigé! Merci pour votre compréhension!

Hello! If you would like to show people that the way is private, it's better to insert the tag "access=private" on the ways representing the private portions. Their color will be rendered accordingly thus making it clearer. On a node we don't see such important information. Also any barriers would be welcome. I've corrected. Thanks for your comprehension.

Spotted a few others which will be resolved.

Hello! Why did you change these buildings into a landuse=farmyard (example: way/147511488/history ) ??? Which are already on a farmyard way/147511487.
Non sense... This can be considered as vandalism of OSM's data and degrades the effort put by OSM contributors.

node/1804965807/history

Je crois que je n'ai pas besoin d'en dire plus :) S'il vous plait, faites attention. Merci!

Great! Thanks for letting me know! :)

Hello! Do you know if this way way/332024890 is still a trail path or has it been enlarged by a heavy duty machine? Like this track way/256489414

+ tag corrections

Hello! Why did you delete the paths and steps between the cave node/5622830236 and this intersectionhttps://www.openstreetmap.org/node/715708236 ?

IGN survey point was not displaced, only edited duplicated description

I will have to revert several of your changesets because the previous situation was clearly more faithful. Please see these 2 comparisons between Strava traces and the Geoportail.lu topo
https://drive.google.com/drive/u/1/folders/0BzU9J1u6HDyCUW52WU5PYzFoRTg

Please STOP these imports or copies from Geoprotail's topo! It has shown countless errors not faithful to reality on terrain.

Oh OK! Thanks for the information! Since it was partially destroyed and know the present situation, can you please edit accordingly whenever you have time, please?

Ok thank you for the response. But be aware that "impassable" value means that the highway is impassable for all kinds of vehicle... not only for one means of mobility. Each value of the smoothness limits more and more some vehicles.

Why did you put this as "smoothness=impassable"?

way/566105212/history

way/653337442/history

Why buildings inside buildings???

This way an unclassified road??? way/529083083/history
Please respect the tag schemes adopted by OSM's consesus that you can find in OSM's Wiki. I corrected. Thanks for your comprehension.