So the only ones we recognize at travelmapping.net are US 30 Fremont, US 20 SSC (as a continuation of the Iowa one), NE 2 GI, and NE 2/US 75 in Neb City. Last time I looked there was enough signage to keep the US 30 one in Fremont but they could have removed more this year that I'm not aware of.

As far as I remember there was only one sign at Bell and 23rd, and it's hard to infer a route relation from one sign. I can add it back in if you'd like.

Hey, just as a heads up, we came to an agreement that the US:CO:Weld network was only in place for roads that had pentagonal signs: network=US:CO:Weld, various forum discussions

Why are the name fields getting removed?

Thanks! Missing the plain dirt areas out by Mirror (no good tag) and I still haven't got around to doing the landuse out by Cox.

revert this please

exactly, subareas are basically useless

West of US 85 it's a bit confusing too, just updated that as well: changeset/174469148

Note that the county road relations were determined to only be needed where the pentagon signs are (mainly along I-25) since everything else is streetblades. See network=US:CO:Weld which I updated to reflect the discussion.

So when I was investigating the area, I noticed that the addresses along that road were all "14th Street" so that's what I set the 'name' as. Did some further investigation this morning and found streetblade signage for County Road 14 1/2 so I added a segment after the last driveway: changeset/174463722

Thanks! I did end up updating it, think when I added it in I was going off of the developer's signs which were obviously wrong

Last time I checked, the sign said East 20th, but they could have adjusted it since I last visited Wahoo. Is there a way you can put me in touch with them directly? I'm curious about addressing and road names at the city limits and would like to discuss that with them, this would serve as a good starting point.

the Pierre one is hard to see with the lighting

https://www.bing.com/maps/?cp=44.367716~-100.352744&lvl=16.4&pi=0.5&style=x&dir=284

https://www.bing.com/maps/?cp=45.574446~-100.485079&lvl=17.2&style=x&pi=-10.3&dir=198.5

Yeah they are, don't know why SDDOT signed it that way

Also I noticed that you deleted some "name" tags where there were multiple names. Please do not do this.

see relation/19328507 for a "finished" example, I was just planning on only having route relations for the signed portions of the CRs. Also, I think the conclusion was reached that route relations don't need a name if they have a signed ref

So the reason I've been deleting the Weld CR Relations is that the vast majority of them are not signed with pentagons (as opposed to Larimer), and the relation doesn't give any more information than is given in the name tag. I tried to do a "signed/unsigned" distinction similar to how US 85 is, but that just didn't work very well

also thank you!

Last time I looked most of the letters had peeled off, it was more substantial 11 years ago