Russ McD's Comments
| Changeset | When | Comment |
|---|---|---|
| 101239017 | I wish you would stop tagging these U-turns as residential roads - more experienced mappers than you have drawn them in as Primary links, so kindly stop messing up existing work.
|
|
| 118008734 | Thanks for fixing it. |
|
| 107824066 | Kulmay - Node: 2586776307 - you have tagged this as barrier=yes.
|
|
| 116100656 | No problem with any of the above (and after surveying said road on Thursday, it truly didn't deserve tert status). But it also had no signs or mileposts, which I guess is the point I'm trying to make.
|
|
| 103882067 | Furthermore, the road correctly has 4 lanes ... when u added the second carriageway, you made no attempt to correct the lane information, or even add the road ref to the tiny sections you added, all of which should have been merged.
|
|
| 103882067 | Kesinee - Way: ถนน พ่อขุน (936999759) - Why have you made this road into a dual carraigeway?
|
|
| 116100656 | Julian, the point is I have been mapping here 12 years and get worn out with people just deciding they think a road should have its status changed. My notes on my GPS 7 years ago show it was tertiary then, and when I whizzed past yesterday, I think I saw a blue sign, glanced at my GPS, and saw the road was no longer tertiary.
|
|
| 116100656 | Its Way: ชม.4049 (284221982), but I deleted your unclassified bits and extended original so you probably can see your edits any more.
|
|
| 116100656 | cmoffroad - I don't know what you are playing at with this road. Its tertiary all the way from the 1001, but for some reason you changed the west section to unclassified, and split the road arbitrarily where a track meets it. The tagging is identical both sides so why split ?
|
|
| 24095607 | Hi, as far as I remember when I lived there, the public could walk through this road that belonged to the church, so I still feel permissive is the right tag. As you can traverse its length, destination is not so appropriate.... however things may have changed in 7 years so if you feel destination is now more accurate, feel free to change.
|
|
| 104282422 | Qomar IRM-ED : please do not add the bridge tag to roads that you have not surveyed. (way/325724296, v3)
|
|
| 104826118 | pa_dala - In Mapping and improving road attributes, you have drawn the ways that lead to many houses, as a "footway" !
|
|
| 109122499 | It seems like way/970267042 also has the one way direction incorrect. This should be blatantly obvious if you checked your edits. Its no wonder my GPS did not route correctly in this area.
|
|
| 109122499 | Dear rat_lorand-grab .....
|
|
| 116003451 | Done. |
|
| 116003451 | Argh .... thanks for picking that up. I'll change in the next 24 hrs.
|
|
| 109073966 | Why is the Grab Data team still adding small farm tracks in rural areas, as RESIDENTIAL ROADS ?
|
|
| 114549246 | No worries...I'll check out that new overpass when I'm passing next, but doubt if its finished yet. |
|
| 114549246 | Dave - is the 1102 really all one way here ? I know its a narrowish road, but I have not been down of late. Doesn't make sense if they changed this bit ! |
|
| 112686819 | Yes, my apologies, I picked the wrong changeset, and hence the wrong user. Rgds. |