RedAuburn's Comments
| Changeset | When | Comment |
|---|---|---|
| 148408392 | please be careful when converting to proposed, way/1259278093 was marked as a proposed cycleway, when it's already a normal pavement |
|
| 152559054 | thank you for resolving my note! :) |
|
| 152519874 | oops didn't add area in this cs |
|
| 152218604 | also confirmed from os openmap |
|
| 151893632 | ||
| 150263943 | thank you :) |
|
| 124457409 | hiya, what is amenity=small_electric_vehicle? would be great to have your input on note/4262761
|
|
| 151734305 | It's better to use the lifecycle tagging scheme, so this would still retain the tags `was:name=WHSmith + disused:shop=newsagent`, that way it's easy to query/display what the shop used to be :) |
|
| 150263943 | Assuming this is for https://www.secretgardenparty.com/, so are these buildings temporary? The typical OSM practice is to only map something if it'll exist for more than ~2 months |
|
| 150544510 | are you sure? i find it hard to believe it's in this field |
|
| 91313986 | ah wait it was michaelbrown a couple of years before, sorry |
|
| 91313986 | You tagged node/2821301783 with note=closed, is this still the case? If so, it'd be good to use osm.wiki/Lifecycle_prefix (or just delete it) many thanks :) |
|
| 151618464 | Thank you for the edits, and welcome to OSM! 😊
in this case, I've added camp_site=basic (camp_site=basic) And moved the descriptive name to the description=* tag.
|
|
| 150831946 | mm you're right, I don't believe there's anything signed. Looks like you've opened an issue in the SC repo already 👍 https://github.com/streetcomplete/StreetComplete/issues/4998 |
|
| 149444975 | Thank you for these updates, looks very nice! :) |
|
| 143535621 | thanks for the update :) |
|
| 149834198 | see https://github.com/organicmaps/organicmaps/issues/7642 the issue has now been fixed in OM, but i will re-run the query in a month or so to catch any stragglers |
|
| 149410216 | *not parking |
|
| 122759315 | According to note/4061087, all Santander cycle stations have been removed, is this relation/the docks still valid? |
|
| 146592467 | thanks for the edit, be careful not to break bus relations though :) |