I don't think it's justified to add cave entrances in the middle of the street without sources at least...

removed in changeset/137261084, please revert it if these actually do exist

in fact, this changeset added multiple cave entrances on roads 🤔

is there really a cave entrance here? node/10929735001

thank you!

Hi! I think it's suggesting lanes because it's highway=service, not leisure=slipway. But thinking about it, lanes is probably the best tag to use here 👍 re-added

Hi, you tagged these roads with lanes=25, I have a feeling it was meant to be maxspeed?

Hi!
to indicate that opening hours continue into the next day, it's best to use 06:00-24:30, otherwise it'll be interpreted as being open from 00:30-06:00.

I've fixed it now, but it's good to remember for the future.
Thank you :)

oops, source is bing

old_name is fine too :)

thank you for the update! just fyi, it's good practice to use lifecyle prefixes (osm.wiki/Lifecycle_prefix) when marking a POI as closed

in this case, the correct tagging would be was:name=Andrew Martin, disused:shop=paint

just fyi, you accidentally added ford=yes to the gates here:
node/10544232218
node/4189248606

fixed now :)

Ah sorry! it looked like it was there on imagery. Thanks for the fix :)

ah, forgot issues are reported in the github, reported there: https://github.com/cyclestreets/tflcid-conversion/issues/50

Hi :) node/10275696019 definitely doesn't exist at this location (on a main road)

i see we all had the same idea 😂

I think I assumed they'd just changed their branding to "Paul". Definitely poor validation on my part, but opened an issue on the NSI for it: https://github.com/osmlab/name-suggestion-index/issues/7707

ah oops sorry, thanks for the fix <3

this is incredible work, thank you so much!

no worries :)