A little bit more information would be nice. What are you doing to the railway and what is the source of your information?

The changeset comment is wrong. This was a walking survey

Sorry but that would be impossible

Did you happen to see a postbox on your visit? There might be one in the area but it hasn't been added to OSM yet.

Hi,
Have you any local knowledge of this path?
Last time I checked it was all inaccessible

Nice work, map looks so much better with the land use completed

Hi, A little bit more information about what you are changing would be nice. Just typing "Plym" doesn't help people understand what you have done.
Thank you

OK, I've changed it to service road and track, I think that's more accurate to what the road is used for

Hi AntV,
You re-added PL6 242D at it's old location. I've moved it to it's new location but kept all the tags.

Can I ask why you changed this to path?
This is the only access to the fields for farm type vehicles.

I'm not sure Track is the right tag to use for a road like this

highway=track

stahp

Well I certainly didn't duplicate anything. I can't really see what happened if you've already fixed it. Perhaps a bug in iD or SC. I certainly split the way at many points and used iD to automatically add bridges

Because it makes life harder for everyone else. It's hard to monitor changes in a local area when the history is spammed by people making global changes, most of which are unnecessary anyway.

Hi PP,
There's a node (9105152268) with the name (Discesa a mare con scale alla fine) which I don't understand.
I've deleted the way because the path is permanently blocked and overgrown but not sure what to do with the node, it if has any meaning

This changeset has deleted footpaths that exist, including a set of steps that exists. The footpaths may not be public access, although there is no forbidding signage. This changeset should be reverted
---
#REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/120183067

You've deleted paths that do exist, including an entire staircase.
Whether they are legally public footpaths or not is irrelevant.

Hi BinkyBunny,
What source are you using? How do you know it's an ANPR camera?

Some of them could use the name and brand tags updating too eg
way/358637686

I was just interested in what you are doing and how you are doing it, I don't have a problem with any of your changes.
Any speed limits I have set were from a walking survey using StreetComplete as I go. SC puts the source information on the changeset. If you see any errors please let me know.