QuiLe's Comments
| Changeset | When | Comment |
|---|---|---|
| 178478675 | Hello and thanks for your contiributions. I noticed you put the access tags as no, does this mean that the road has been closed or is no longer accessible? Additionally, you misspelled the access key on way/1477017917 with "ni" rather than "no".
|
|
| 178075092 | Added an alley way in Dallas, Texas.... |
|
| 177950831 | Hi there and thanks for your contribution to OSM! Can you please detail the source for your additions? It looks like you used "local knowledge" and some of these amenities are added close to the road node and not the building that the business is located in. Having accurate locations for nodes is important for OSM. Additionally, the addition of addr tags for where these businesses are missing. If you have these addresses it's important to add it.
|
|
| 177918474 | Hi and thanks for your contributions! It looks like this Flock node might be in a building, can you please check and make sure that this is placed correctly?
|
|
| 177918482 | Hi and thanks for your contributions! It looks like this Flock node might be in a building, can you please check and make sure that this is placed correctly?
|
|
| 177918474 | Hi and thanks for your contributions! It looks like this Flock node might be in a building, can you please check and make sure that this is placed correctly?
|
|
| 177831493 | Hi lucidoffices, Thanks for contributing. Could you please write more descriptive changeset comments? Unfortunately "-" doesn't convey enough information for other users to know what you've edited. You can find examples of good changeset comments here: osm.wiki/Good_changeset_comments A good example for your changeset comment could be “Added a co-working office space in Frisco” or “removed old tags for office building” Thank you, QuiLe
|
|
| 177806545 | Hi lucidoffices, Thanks for contributing. Could you please write more descriptive changeset comments? Unfortunately "-" doesn't convey enough information for other users to know what you've edited. You can find examples of good changeset comments here: osm.wiki/Good_changeset_comments Thank you,
|
|
| 177569680 | Hello JShimasam and thanks for your contributions to OSM! I noticed you've been adding parking lots but a lot of these lots have had irregular or non-square bounds, this can look weird with overlapping ways or non-square polygons. Could you try to square your ways. (TIP: You can press Q on a way to square it).
|
|
| 177544648 | Hi there! Thanks for your contributions to OSM. I am looking at this changeset and I am confused by it. Do you mean that the valet operator for this chain (The Captal Grille) takes Bitcoin? If so, this is not clear that the business is a parking or business. If anything, the Valet should have a company name and it is not Valet.
|
|
| 177100622 | No problem! This is much better than using Line names since that can change. In retrospect, corridor names rarely change. |
|
| 177100622 | I wonder if these corridor names are helpful enough. I do not know whether these are official names. These maps highlight the station corridors. 1. Downtown Dallas Central Business District
|
|
| 177315293 | Thanks for your contributions! It looks like you may have added your unit number. Usually we would apply this directly to the buidling itself and merge the points together and add all the units, ranges.Since the Brea itself is a 4 building complex adding the proper landuse would also be adequate. I haven't been to the Brea in a few weeks, but I can try to map this area when I'm back.
|
|
| 176724774 | Reverted |
|
| 168975089 | I see that now. Would it still be appropriate to at least use short_name to list the name as listed on a street sign? |
|
| 168975089 | Yes in Sachse it’s signed as SH 78 or HWY 78. Expanded then it should be State Highway 78 or Highway 78 |
|
| 168975089 | Hi, I'm working on adding addr tags around SH 78, and it seems there is no Name tag for specific sections, particularly for Sachse, Texas. The issue I'm running into is that all the address tags for businesses and buildings now have outdated or incorrect names since the street name was removed. I'm not too familiar with the noname tag, but I assume all of these should at least have a name. |
|
| 176032036 | Thank you for your contribution!
|
|
| 175988699 | Thanks for your contribution and for adding address tags!
|
|
| 175985664 | Changeset looks good, consider adding fire_path=yes if this is only for firetrucks and works as a fire lane or access path.
|