Ich kann das Argument ohnehin nicht nachvollziehen. In diesem Changeset hier sind etliche Wege gelöscht/erstellt, way/418930385 hingegen ohne Löschen in der Geometrie verändert.
http://nrenner.github.io/achavi/?changeset=85287591

In http://nrenner.github.io/achavi/?changeset=85299349 ist way/656912653 gelöscht / way/804585769 erstellt, während
way/656912647 korrekt durch Verschieben/Hinzufügen von Nodes bearbeitet wurde, z.B. node/6153110097

Am Gerät scheint es somit nicht zu liegen.

CS also includes: restore way deleted in #85261454

Auch hier werden Objekte gelöscht, um sie in leicht veränderter Geometrie neu zu zeichnen.

That's the correct approach then, much appreciated.

Hi ClarkstonCorrect, could you please tell us what map you have warped in mapwarper?

Mapwarper is a tool for rectifying imagery, so we need to know if using the map or image itself is allowed for OpenStreetMap?

Dear Furth,
it appears that http://mapwarper.net/maps/43858
is a commercial map from the development company. What permission have you obtained to copy information into OpenStreetMap?

You must not use any copyrighted sources for editing OpenStreetMap without permission. Please start reading here:
osm.wiki/Copyright

Hi ClarkstonCorrect, could you please tell us what map you have warped in mapwarper?

Mapwarper is a tool for rectifying imagery, so we need to know if using the map or image itself is allowed for OpenStreetMap?

Dear A72, you must not use any copyrighted sources for editing OpenStreetMap without permission. Please start reading here:
osm.wiki/Copyright

Specifically, the T&C of the planning permission site you are citing,
https://www.scotborders.gov.uk/terms
clearly say that information from their site
- must not be used ... for commercial purposes (while OSM is being used commercially)
- for parts of the content copyright holder is a third party, specifically maps and plans.

Therefore, please stop using such plans, and remove information you have copied this way from OSM. We can help you if needed.

Data Working Group Ticket#2020022110000123

implausible big building across road.
implausible big bank building over residential buildings.
implausible access=no on residential roads, unnecessary splitting of roads for this purpose

reverted in #83414738

apparent fiction reverted in #83414668

fiction as previous cs.

reverted in #83414615

neither visible in aerial nor in mapillary imagery.

reverted in #83414589

Supermarket name changed contrary to 2019 mapillary images; unexplained street name changes; impassable road blocks contrary to mapillary showing a passable checkpoint.

reverted in #83414342

fictive changes of trunk roads to motorway, creation of fictive link roads, malicious deletion of landuse, malicious deletion of tracks.

reverted in #83414229

reverted in #83414036

reverted in #83413948

Hi ratrun,
could you kindly explain what you mean with "osmi routing view fixes" in this particular changeset? It is hard to guess since you seem to give the same comment in all your changesets.
I had to revert this CS since it was creating conflicts when reverting fiction from 82749239 and 82748758.
Ok, apparently you joined dup nodes - but did you check if the link road you joined even exists?

The northern extension of way/149765193 appears to be fiction according to Maxar Premium, mapillary imagery 2019, and absence of GPX tracks.
It is implausible considering the existing motorways cut into the landscape structure as visible in mapillary.

The new link way/785310768 appears to be fiction according to Maxar Premium, mapillary imagery 2019, ans absence of GPX tracks.

It is evident from streetlevel mapillary imagery dated Nov 2019 that your "motorway" edits in this changeset, including all the bridges and motorway links, are FICTION.