Revert of remaining structures in 79435580 (DWG ticket #2020011010000101)
DE: Grünheide: proposed Tesla-campus: Revert proposed layout drawn in changeset/79188025 79187836 79187802 79187698 79187645 79187597 79187454 79186726, for being copied from an outdated 'leaked' plan with unknown copyright.

osm.org/user_blocks/3374

deleted as duplicate of surrounding building, way/198893791

Various aerial imagery showing a collapsed house here. Removed as fiction.

Zara: duplicate of a shop in the same street, deleted
Gucci: apparently correct

deleted as duplicate of surrounding way/198895596

Could you please provide evidence that this feature exists?

deleted as duplicate of Niedersorbisches Gymnasium Sielower Str 37 (changeset/79113187)

Partially reverted by user pio2_122 in changeset/78413406 for being fiction; mostly at least.

Does this even exits?

I checked some of the nodes in Berlin/Germany, and they were fiction as well.

Der beleidigende off-topic-Kommentar zwischen dem Erst-Kommentar von kartonage und der Antwort von xogalla wurde ausgeblendet.

Dear Dominik Pych, it seems you were trying to fix errors from changeset/78964056, however in order to revert them completely I had to roll back this CS as well.
Please kindly check the objects again.

This changeset has been reverted in
Changeset: 79060884 for technical reasons:
PL: DWG revert of changeset/79007598 78964992 78964209 for conflict resolving while reverting 78964056 for fixing vandalism/fiction by new user in 78964056

Dear tkedt, it seems you were trying to fix errors from changeset/78964056, however in order to revert them completely I had to roll back this CS as well.
Please kindly check the objects again.

This changeset has been reverted in
Changeset: 79060884 for technical reasons:
PL: DWG revert of changeset/79007598 78964992 78964209 for conflict resolving while reverting 78964056 for fixing vandalism/fiction by new user in 78964056

Dear tkedt, it seems you were trying to fix errors from changeset/78964056, however in order to revert them completely I had to roll back this CS as well.
Please kindly check the objects again.

This changeset has been reverted in
Changeset: 79060884 for technical reasons:
PL: DWG revert of changeset/79007598 78964992 78964209 for conflict resolving while reverting 78964056 for fixing vandalism/fiction by new user in 78964056

DWG Ticket#2019123010000126

This changeset has been reverted in
Changeset: 79060884 where the comment is:
PL: DWG revert of changeset/79007598 78964992 78964209 78964056 for fixing vandalism/fiction by new user in 78964056; other CSs were reverted for conflict resolving

Dear Mapper50: Please do not copy from Google. Read here: osm.wiki/FAQ#Why_don.27t_you_just_use_Google_Maps.2Fwhoever_for_your_data.3F

As for your source "streetlevel imagery", could you please specify what imagery you are using?

Reverted in changesets: 75348433
Comment: DE: Berlin: revert changeset/75348116 declaring the main part of A100 as a link.

I have checked the area against aerial imagery, and it looks being mapped correctly. The river has a considerable, and therefore mappable, width (e.g. 13 m or 43 feet). This was done here, using multipolygons to represent the woods in the park area and an island in the river.  

It is tagged water=river, which is the modern version to do so. You might have a different concept what a riverbank is, in OSM it just means the area that is filled with water from the river. 

Please do not remove any water polygons other mappers have drawn. This is not just a ditch.