This changeset has been fully reverted for the following reasons (DWG Ticket#2020022910000011):
- malicious deletion of river segment
- needless splitting of rivers
- removal of existing water bodies
- speculative landuse assignments and removals
- mechanical tag regression and removal of amenity tags
- armchair removals of small features such as barrier=wall tags

DWG Ticket#2020022910000011

Dear cuchufleta,
why did you delete the shop node/6571876052 ?

Please do not remove amenity tags from research institutes.

Why do you delete large landuse relations, without caring for the member ways, and without refining the landuse?

You have deleted a house, that was drawn in 2018 and is visible in various aerial imagery, way/582303031
and replaced with a single building node
node/6986990648
to which you transferred the properties like levels, and the address.

What is the reason for this regression?

Repaired.

correction: s/DE/US/

Hi interdite,
you added the undocumented unusual tag "urbanized=yes" to all these residential landuses.
What does it mean?

This CS has been reverted in 81607692 with the comment:
DE: revert unreasonable removal of amenity tags in #81243225

edathy, you still owe us an explanation:
- what happened to the over 1400 deleted buildings?
- what is the source for the estimated 600 buildings that you updated with house numbers and addresses?

"generic:landuse" repaired on two areas.

Where is the name for Way: Khouchar Khouribga (694153259) from?

Hallo edathy,
mit der Löschung von relation/3158329 hast du keine Verbesserung geschaffen, vielmehr hast du die member-ways nicht beachtet und nur den Landuse gelöscht.
Repariert.

Um nochmal auf das Problem zurückzukommen:
auch
way/85445942/history
Tischlerei Brauckhoff hast du grundlos gelöscht, die Firma arbeitet noch und hat sogar angebaut. Andere User haben das Gebäude neu zeichnen müssen.
Also, warum die Löschung?

Hi interdite,
in this CS you intentionally deleted a large farmland landuse relation, without any refinements or caring for the relation members. You caused extra work for other mappers to restore it.

@Abruzzzo - could you explain your insult against smaprs ?

Same question as in changeset/80386313,
why did you mechanically remove the tags "man_made=works" from objects also tagged building=industrial?

Hi Abruzzzo, could you please explain why you mechanically removed 1677 tags "man_made=works" from objects also tagged building=industrial?
Did you check each of them that no "works" is being performed there?
Has the mechanical edit been discussed somewhere?
Could you see that from Bing which you gave as a source?

Hi Abruzzzo,
could you please explain why you deleted a large landuse relations, leaving the member ways orphaned?

Refining landuse would have been good, blunt deletion is vandalism.

As other editors have meanwhile removed some of the untagged ways, restoring the relation is complicated.

Please refrain from removing the more modern tagging of "natural=water + water=reservoir". Repaired.

reverted in changeset: 81428471 where the comment is:
SE: revert changeset/81135174 which deleted 9 corine landuse relations, leaving their ways orphaned, and without any replacement/refinement